this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
570 points (99.1% liked)

politics

27959 readers
3256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember when he told people to get over it the day after a school shooting?

But protestors getting murdered I by his this is when he calls for removing guns... From the protestors.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

It's nuts right? If they ban guns from protestors, what reason will they have to shoot them? What deadly weapon will they say...

Oh right, cars.

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is definitely a feeler. As soon as the blowback hits he’ll change topic and prevent like he never said it. Of course MAGA will forget it too

[–] prototact@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At this point it is just to aggravate the left side and direct attention away from the main issue, which is ICE murdering people. MAGA at this point only cares that they remain in power and they dismantle the liberal state. Everything else is chatter.

[–] WarnikOdinson@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'd even go so far to say that ICE murdering people is a distraction from the Epstein Files.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The best time to get the files was years ago, when Dems held power. The files are heavily redacted and useless now. You'd think the Dems would've used the files as ammo, but I guess that's a GOP strat.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Yah keep thinking that. The Epstein files are not the magic bullet you think they are.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

hes getting spooked out....

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Trump will betray literally everyone who trusts him.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

He doesn't know what he is talking about most of the time and this time he didn't realize the camera's were on, or his honest feelings came out.

New yorkers have always known trump is a POS and will change his opinion to whatever gets him money and power. We all know he used to be a democrat, but changed to republican because the democrats hated him and knew he is a POS.

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

LMAOOOO!!!!!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He really is trying to make enemies of everyone heh. Those guys get mad enough, he may yet find himself perforated

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 227 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh NOW it's a conversation they're willing to have. Not after 20 years of school shootings.

Fucking hypocrite cunts.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

We're almost at 30. Columbine was 99.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The NRA and gun rights groups have condemned Trump's rhetoric.

Seems like it's just the UltraMAGA typical bootlickers that are rolling over for Trump.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 week ago

Anything that fractures the republican base is a plus

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 134 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

Hahaha children are shot in the face. Who cares. A white man packing a concealed weapon is murdered by ICE. Oh noes we must have gun control!

Get the fuck out of here.

Edit: I'm laughing incredulously because the situation is so fucked.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And that white man didnt even USE his gun. So fucking funny.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.

Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.

Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!

I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZeroPoke@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This isnt new from him. He said take the guns back in like 2018 "Take the guns first, go through due process second"
https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-donald-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/4717030

2A still voted for him tho shrugs Something something libs take our guns.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Him and bondi were on camera at the start of this term with Bondi telling him that somebody charged with a crime, fed or state, the feds would come in and take their guns and even if they were found not guilty later the feds would decide whether they wanted to give the guns back or not. And the president was like huh okay.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

California's strict gun control started with Reagan because he wanted to disarm the Black Panthers. Republicans are pro 2A, as long as it is reserved for white conservative/fascist people.

EDIT: Governor Reagan. So, before he became president, but 100 fold once he got shot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (10 children)

They are clearly trying to ensure that they will never be subject to a legitimate election again. Minnesota is a test for how many constitutional amendments they can break. Presidential term limits are absolutely the target. When the oligarchs no longer need their cult they will repeal the entire Constitution. Welcome to the New Confederacy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 week ago

Will Trump be the one who solves the gun problem in the US?

Nope, because it will be, "Gun for me, not for thee."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So let's see, no Epstein Files, America First is out the window, prices keep rising, and now we're going to restrict the 2nd Amendment.

What exactly is MAGA in for now? The voracious Corruption? The virtuosic incompetence? The Pedophilia? Death Squads spontaneously forming firing squads and executing American citizens in the streets?

Does this look like the kind of freedom you were voting for?

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All that winning must be getting tiring.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Settle down people. This isn't what you think it is.

They're using this as an explanation of why Pretti was executed.

They're not suggesting that MAGA dickheads cant carry guns.

While irreconcilable to any thinking person. These two statements can happily co-exist in the minds of idiots.

This whole thing is "rules for thee but not for me".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RainbowHedgehog@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just like when gun control was brought to California when the Black Panthers open carried.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

First he switched the right to pro-tariffs..

Then he switched the right to not-anti-pedophile...

Now switching it to pro-gun-control

Look, can he just hurry the fuck up and get MAGA to support socialism already? I don't feel like waiting this long

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 6 points 6 days ago

I want to agree, but knowing Trump it would be a national flavor of socialism :/

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Nvidia is owned in part now by the USA. It's already there. Except he's jumping straight into a corrupt socialist state where the people see nothing and the government takes everything.

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He just wants ICE, Fascists, 2A-toters and white rednecks to be armed.

He doesn't want blacks, LGBTQ and enemies of the government to be armed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We do need gun control. For ICE. Those criminals should not be armed.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, they're an entity designed to enforce misdemeanors offenses. This is not something that should require being armed.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Oh now the ‘tHeY gUn GiT yEr GuNz’ asshat cares about gun control? How long till political affiliation counts as reason to revoke gun permits?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

From the guy that defended Rittenhouse’s gun as a tool of “self defense.”

load more comments
view more: next ›