this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
229 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

80503 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 29 points 6 days ago

Chrome has added Auto Browse

sit down, lean back, and watch the internet scroll by /s

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 35 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This actually sounds interesting.

"Find all comments on lemmy that are wrong. Respond explaining how they are wrong."

That would save me a lot of work.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Brilliant! You'll save us all a lot of work. Plus we will finally figure out which version of Linux is the correct one.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Let's give everyone an army of spambots! What could go wrong?"

I'm gonna start reading books again.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I don't know if he joking or not but seriously I started reading again regularly like a year ish ago and I think my attention span getting better. Just not spending as much time scrolling bullshit is a big W along with practicing a longer attention span weather it's reading or something else. Go get a terry pratchet book !

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago

I love software that acts without my consent or knowledge while atrophying my brain and wasting tremendous amounts of resources

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

These companies are all tone deaf

Its more than tone. They are just deaf dumb and stupid when it comes to what their users are saying.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That does it, I’m never installing Chrome again. I haven’t in years anyway because it’s garbage spyware, but still.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 8 points 5 days ago

I haven't in years anyway

Exactly why they can pull off anything like that. People who still stay with Chrome are mostly those who'll eat it up anyway.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

save us vivaldi you're our only hope

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Vivaldi is in big part closed source, so we literally don't know what it does behind the scenes

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The minority of Vivaldi is closed source from what I have read actually - specifically the stuff they have that makes its fancy UI work, but someone can correct me with a citation if that is not true.

They state that about 95% of it is available to be read where 92% of that is open source from Chromium, 3% is open source from Vivaldi themselves, and the last 5% that is not available to be read is Vivaldi's UI.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Still far from open source or free software, but better than most people would think. I guess you would also have to trust them that it really is just the UI.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Exactly. Yes, I know they claim it's just the UI, and the sole purpose of closed-source code is to make it harder to steal innovative UI elements - but when it comes to something as sensitive as the browser, I'd like for these claims to be verifiable.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

closed source due to the small team but they're also incredibly open about both the company the advocacy for the internet

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

closed source due to the small team

There are open source projects created and managed by a single developer. A "small team" is not a reason to be closed source.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

Ladybird is also getting there.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

so aren't firefox forks

and ladybird might be nice but the dev outed himself as a right wing bigot

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

Firefox forks are less vulnerable purely due to the fact that the main browser engine isnt being developed by a self interested advertising company. (See the recent manifest V3 and discontinuation of V2 shitshow for a example of googles stranglehold causing problems)

& when it comes to browser engines I'll set politics aside even if someone has views in very poor taste. The project overall is FOSS and thusly is being developed by hundreds of contributors, I've contributed a few bits and pieces for it even.

Having an additional standalone browser engine serves as insurance against Mozilla doing a stupid and a bulwark against Google dominance.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Servo browser is the other big from the ground browser project. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_%28software%29

[–] teft@piefed.social 101 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is one of those agents going to jerk off for you too? Who the fuck needs an agent to browse the web for them?

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

It's trying to solve a problem created by SEO slop. "Find me the cheapest car rental".... That's actually hard to do now bc SEO grift. Rather than building a more honest system, you get "agents" to do the searching for you

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see someone didn't use Ask Jeeves back then /s

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It didn’t make sense then, and it doesn’t make sense now. Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

Isn't that only because of the limitations of the available technology only being able to handle simple strings, though? Conversational computing has been a pipe dream since early sci-fi, where characters would talk to their computers as if they were human; George Jetson never spoke to Rosie in keyword queries.

I feel like keyword search syntax being "king" is more of a symptom, than an intentional choice.

[–] ainmosni@startrek.website 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You realise that the reason conversational computing is so popular in science fiction, is because it looks better on camera, right.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 16 points 6 days ago

This is a very good point - in books/dramas it helps the exposition to have a character you can relay half the plot details to. Similarly in radio dramas, every conversation between characters starts with saying each others names and a full recap of whatever the subject is... But nobody in the real world does or wants to talk like that.

Real people just say "hey, is that thing fixed yet?", not "hello Chris, you remember yesterday we were discussing the il problem with the Thing, and you proposed Cornfootling it; what happened?"

When I want Alexa to turn on the lights, I want to just say "Alexa, turn on the lights", not have a goddamned debate. And when I want to search for whatever the hell Cornfootling is, I just want to type "Cornfootling" and hit search.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 week ago

I loathe (couldn’t figure out a synonym more than that) the word agentic. It sums up everything bad and wrong about AI.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It will handle your socials, chats, your agenda, your website, your credit card, your vacations, your photos from the moment of activation to well after death....

[–] danh2os@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you trying to tell me that my computer will remember me better than my kids?

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

No. The server will simply keep raising your kids after you're gone and better than you ever could.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All so you can spend more time generating value for your masters and overlords. Huzzah, we've eliminated the pesky scourge of free time!

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also so they can easily predict who is with them and who is against them. Who’s got the hot new ideas so they can beat them to market. Who might challenge the status quo.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Who’s got the hot new ideas so they can beat them to market.

Well, there's an absolutely plausible motive that I hadn't considered, yet. Fuuuuuuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They want to push all this shit in browsers so that they can start automatically buying shit once they're selling ads

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

God, I hadn't thought of that. It's going to be like cancelling a cable subscription but worse.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

You know what this is launching just in time for?

Tax season.

Cue* 10 million people getting audited because they let their browser file their taxes for them.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 6 days ago

If they're auditing that many of them, there will be a queue, too.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, I realized that as soon as I posted it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›