this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
537 points (95.6% liked)

Political Memes

9573 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This post has been reported. The reason given:

Engagement bait

I mean, if you feel people shouldn't be posting engaging content....

Leaving it up.

EDIT: people keep complaining. There's no rule against this, and the meme stands on its own without the line though the word.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thank you for taking the time to respond. I guess I could have been more clear: this trend of half-assedly crossing out normal words is a clear manipulation tactic to increase the comment count of a post and boost engagement because people inevitably call out the bullshit in the comments section. It dilutes the discussion and becomes very tedious when it happens so often.

i would like to report this post. it seems to be bombing.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's pretty obvious the report is due to the badly censored word. That's specifically done as engagement bait. And saying "that's how I found it" isn't an acceptable reason, anyone could very easily edit it out in a few seconds (Not that anyone did, just showing that there is absolutely no reason to post it with the engagement bait).

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just ignore it. If it works then we’re too stupid for it to matter anyway.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ironically, if people (like you) just ignore the line then it won't drive engagement. You're writing multiple comments about how this is bait which is falling for what you consider bait. Personally, I didn't think much of it because it doesn't ~~fucking~~ matter.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Stop. Censoring. ~~Normal.~~ Words.

[–] brambc@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’d say: Stop censoring any words, please.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

~~Or censor all words. Everybody shutting up would help a whole lot more than anything anyone could say.~~

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's why I cross out "normal."

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If this came from another, corporate run platform, they OCR images and “normal” words will get your content deplatformed so

Sorry the online world is more of a sinister dystopia than you may have considered

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] berber@feddit.org 33 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

why is the "Viole" in "Violence" crossed out?

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I assume getting around TikTok and Meta algorithms that would automatically filter this image from public view.

Gotta make it safe and corpo friendly for the advertisers! 🙄

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Imagine being a child and seeing the word violence or ass. I would kill myself

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

You would what yourself? Up 'til now you'd have been shielded from that scary word!

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has nothing to do with what children see, the reasoning is that advertisers don't want their products to be associated with violence by showing their ad next to a post about violence.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also platforms don’t want to be seen as places of free expression by the current administration. State department approved messaging only!

imagine it was really fine ass, and you never saw ass that fine again

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I would literally shake

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

It probably just gets tagged as "spicy meme someone tried to censor", and still gets tracked and targeted the same way as the rest of the content. They know fully well what kind of post it is, a line is not going to break the algorithm

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe to get past software that would screen out political violence posts? To be transparent, I didn't make the meme but the hypocrisy is worth pointing out.

Are you ok, though? Is someone threatening you if you don't post nonsensical memes to Lemmy? Should we call the police?

[–] M137@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

You should have removed it. It's being done as engagement bait a LOT, same with misspelling words. Just the fact that it can be that should be enough to either not share anything that has it or to take a few seconds to edit it out.

[–] aow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

This post was made by a disgruntled viola player

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Engagement bait to increase comments, this getting an algorithm boost. Report and move on.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 2 weeks ago

You'll be happy to know that comments don't matter to the Lemmy algorithm.

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/contributors/07-ranking-algo.html

The ranking is basically (upvotes-downvotes)/time. I don't know whether this is intended as "engagement bait", but it doesn't work.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

You mean to prevent algorithmic censorship on other platforms where this may be crossposted.

Stop fedposting

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

They're not a fan of Tower of God and hate any reference to Ju Viole Grace.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly why I can't take any of these weenies seriously when they spout this nonsense on whatever Pod Save Whatever episode they're on this week.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not just politicians and definitely not only Americans. No one spouting the 'violence is not acceptable' actually means it. They don't mean to abolish the police, military, prisons, taxes, mandatory school...

It's just doublespeak, the violence I like is not violence so if someone responds to it with more violence I can condemn them, they are the violent ones not me.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Post is more related to political violence. The double standards of extreme condemnation when violence used against politicians while they do promote violence towards foreign populations (i.e. palestinians, jews or venezuelans) and local minorities (i.e. racial or radical groups).

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

THE BRITISH ARE COMING

but violence has no place in politics, we should just surrender

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fun fact: Writing on munitions can be considered a violation of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 23, it is forbidden to employ weapons with any substance intended to aggravate a wound. So unless that is a completely non-toxic marker, it could fall under that.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is some distance between "intended" and "could conceivably". Good luck convincing the ICC that a nanoliter of ink is being used as a chemical weapon.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean chances of it happening are almost infinitesimal, but it is still something to consider. I was a munitions troop in the US military for 6 years and this was drilled into us. If there was anything on a bomb or missile it had to be sanded and repainted.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

shrug That sounds more like your officers just didn't want you writing on munitions. But it is something to consider.

[–] hactar42@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

I always thought the same thing until I had to unload a plane one time because they found some corrosion on a bomb. A dumb bomb that was going on it's way to be dropped. Of course that was back in the Bush era when the US government was a little more picky about the war crimes they committed.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

substance intended to aggravate a wound

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

So where does nce belong, then?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

You don't understand. These motors aren't hitting anybody I know or care about, therefore I can feel no guilt about it

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Ah yes. In order to highlight the creators passion of playing the violin, the single-handedly put a bow through the ~~viol~~ part of violence. Truly magnificent.

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

When the censoring is diegetic.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where did the trend of writing on munitions come from? Is it Ukraine or were there cases before that? I'm trying to figure why would anyone ever do that, to me it sounds the same as mass shooter gun scribbles kind of lunacy.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know we did it some in ww1.

Edit: I didn't expect anyone to have researched this lol

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3buled/when_did_the_practice_of_writing_messages_on/

Here's a slingshot ammo from that thread 500BC-1BC

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/G_1851-0507-11

load more comments
view more: next ›