this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
21 points (95.7% liked)

Canada

11731 readers
519 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Was the gun legal? Were there reasonable explanations for the chemicals? Could they also be used in a grow op or drug lab?

There’s been many times when I’ve had chemicals that could be used to make explosives in my home. I’ve even made and detonated explosives on occasion. But I didn’t do so after stealing the ingredients from a local university.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

It said somewhere in the article that the trespasser was arrested with a loaded handgun. So I mean yeah, busting into places with a loaded handgun is generally pretty frowned upon. Even if it's legally possessed, it's now also illegally handled.

I mean you don't bust into labs armed for the purposes of general hobbies or whatever, you wouldn't think, right? To me that makes me think that if someone was going to catch him, he would consider shooting them, which is sort of serious business. I'm thinking there's a lot more to come out about this story, unless these guys are just really that into rockets.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who among us hasn't made a small explosive for fun? No, am not being sarcastic. I've been raised with loud NYE celebrations.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I’m just trying to figure out how the charges make sense; they’re charged with unlawful possession of explosives even though it’s not illegal to possess explosive substances, and they didn’t actually HAVE any explosive substances on the premises — just substances that could be combined.

The only argument I can see is that they had them in volume, and the chemicals in question were volatile enough how they were stored to be a safety threat.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So anyone with fertilizer and fuel oil could be charged with possessing precursor chemicals?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Apparently.