this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
478 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28872 readers
2291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Threat of stationing immigration agents around voting locations has become a concern as it can be a deterrent to legal residents of color who are concerned they may be harassed by federal agents

The White House refused to rule out following through on the threat of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents being sent out to “surround the polls” when voters cast ballots in this November’s midterm elections as a way of depressing Democratic turnout and boosting chances of Republican victories in the House of Representatives and Senate.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said she could offer “no guarantee” that ICE personnel would not be stationed at polling sites when Americans are in the process of choosing whether to extend the Republican stranglehold on power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

She had been asked about former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s recent call for Trump to deploy ICE around election sites on his War Room podcast on Tuesday, just days after Trump himself called for a Republican “takeover” of vote-counting in Democratic-led states and municipalities.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine the optics of these rabid dogs pepper spraying people in line to vote

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The optics don't need to get any worse, they're already murdering people in broad daylight...

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I guess we're kind if past the Ghandi trap's efficacy at this point. I don't know why I keep reverting to previous stages of how this escalated

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got PTO, i don't mind protecting people and staying at the voting place all day to protect them from the ICE thugs taking them to a concentration camp.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Problem is people won't show if they fear ICE will attest yhem, even if they are citizens as ICE has already proven.

Its intimidation

[–] baller_w@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honest question: there’s not that many of them to cover a substantial number of polling stations, are there? If memory serves, there like 16k agents.

Seems like the WH is on its bullshit again.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

The threat of appearance will be enough for a not insignificant number of people. But also, they can use historical voting numbers to selectively target certain locations. No need to send anyone to the R+17 or the D+22 districts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

"Can't guarantee we won't continue to violate the law with impunity."

[–] Should_Have_Done_Better@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sounds like a good reason to pretend to support their bullshit and go vote against it anyway.....register independent then vote however

The declaration of party only helps metrics not the actual outcome of the vote

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If you register independent that prevents you from participating in the large party primaries in many (most/all?) states. You can only vote in the primary for your registered party. So that also locks you out of at least attempting to prevent the Democrats from incessantly fielding dumbass GOP-lite candidates like they've been doing.

Theoretically if you register as Republican that also allows you to surreptitiously torpedo their worst candidates in their primaries, but it's unlikely we'll get enough trolls on board to swing the needle meaningfully with that strategy.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Or differently sounds like a good reason to have black panthers show up and watch ice

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thats not a warning intended to keep the public safe, it's a threat intended to get the public to give up on democracy

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fucking brown shirts

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We the People of the United States can.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Every voter come armed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›