this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
162 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

81087 readers
4212 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.social 13 points 1 hour ago

Huh. Looks like public outcry does work. I'm sure doomers will try to pretend this was a one time fluke.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 50 points 2 hours ago

I’m just glad people were smart enough to realize the implications of “finding lost dogs”. I immediately thought this implied terrible surveillance uses. I asked my wife about how she thought this would work and she thought it was very sweet (she and I are both dog lovers). I said so how are they “identifying these dogs?” She went through the mental process… “they just take the footage and use the same facial recognition to see if a dog matches a missing one…. Oh yeah, that’s bad”.

I guess a lot of other people did the same thing.

[–] Renorc@lemmy.world 30 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

“Following a comprehensive review, we determined the planned Flock Safety integration would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated,” Ring wrote in a blog post. “As a result, we have made the joint decision to cancel the planned integration.”

Not necessarily because of privacy concerns.

[–] III@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago

Absolutely not because of privacy concerns. But definitely not about a resources or time issue. This is them responding to the negative backlash without acknowledging their tone deaf Superbowl ad. If there was time or resource issue they wouldn't have dropped tens of millions of dollars bragging about it.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago

Cancel your prime membership!

[–] db2@lemmy.world 30 points 3 hours ago

They already lost a bunch of people, some destroyed the devices too so no secondhand market customers from them either.

That leopard is gonna get diabetes from all those sweet faces it's eating.

[–] tharien@lemmy.world 42 points 3 hours ago
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

lol no... they're just saying that