this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
60 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

5751 readers
845 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Likely AI, because otherwise they just made up some quotes on their own. Either is egregious journalistic malpractice. But we all know which one it was.

The maintainer reported in the comments of the article that he is exclusively misquoted in the 2nd half of the article (including misquoted calling himself a “gatekeeper”).

Edit: I did confirm all misquotes from archive versions of the blog and ars article. But I also read the blog yesterday and have memory and it hasn’t changed

Edit 2: Ars took down the article, replaced with archive.org. And here’s the blog archive version

https://web.archive.org/web/20260213082753/https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me/

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Getting a "429 Too Many Requests" error.

But if true- this is depressing. I've always viewed Ars as a sort of standard bearer when it comes to tech news. Other outlets like The Verge do a lot of "best [product]" articles with affiliate links, and while I understand why, and don't think they're being dishonest, it just feels cheap. Seeing Ars fail at basic fact-checking is truly depressing.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ars has been on a downward slide in quality for a while in my opinion. Just the other day there was an announcement from NASA about astronauts being able to take smartphones to space and the Ars article mentioned iPhones specifically in the headline and the article despite the press release not naming brands.

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

Yeah that was weird

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I used to email the editor with examples of typos after I complained that their articles were in decline and he said they needed examples. So I sent a bunch of examples. That person was very receptive. He even said it was useful because they’d been discussing internally whether or not they were doing well in that area.

A few years ago, someone else took the position. I found out because I emailed the original person and he replied and CC’d the new editor. That person wasn’t receptive and never showed any sign that they cared that I wanted their articles to be high enough quality that I was confident sharing them with people who I thought needed more science regarding social issues.

Guess Ars is not gonna be among the sites that I trust to get things right from here on. And to hell with any editor who was ok with using agents when writing articles cause they clearly don’t have the internal structure to keep that from being a liability.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

Man that sucks

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago

Oh no, I love their articles.