When is his anal cancer going to hurry up and kill him?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It’s trying to stay at the least shitty end of him.
Trumps arteries need to harden and make it difficult for him to stay alive.
I personally favor Trump developing CJD. It is the perfect way for someone of Trump's caliber to depart this world.
- CJD can be somewhat slowed, for a short time. It cannot be stopped, or cured.
- Trump would experience a slow and painful decay until he finally dies.
- Medical equipment that makes contact with Trump would have to be burned afterwards to prevent spread.
- The breakdown Trump would have when he realizes how fucked he is and how there's jack shit he can do to stop what's coming would be beautiful.
On the other hand, Trump might be able to help the scientific community posthumously if they acquire his CJD-riddled brain.
- Republican voters are less likely to have a passport
- Republican women are more likely to have changed their names at marriage
I say, pass the SAVE act.
Abandoning the remaining low-income and disabled Dems that are less likely to have documentation like that would be a strategically bad move. Not to mention, you currently have Fed that will happily to "Lose" your paperwork when you renew if they can correlate your face with their "Age Verification" data that identifies you as a Democrat.
Give them an inch and they'll take all of it.
Edit: Typo
"iF wE jUsT vOtE hArD eNoUgH, wE cAn StOp Him!" - americans
Well you could have.
now it’s too late. You guys fucked it.
I watched a video that claimed trumps media campaign was a big factor in his 2nd win. Trump went on many podcasts which were blowing up as a popular media in 2025. The democrats went mostly on tv and stage appearances which isn't really meeting the media at the time. A lot of the tv stuff was scripted where people claim the podcasts weren't (i doubt there wasnt at least a loose script). The one podcast the dems did do was a sex centered podcast and most of the listeners probably didn't give a shit compared to the demographic listening to Joe Rogan and the likes. It was such a media blunder that in hindsight it almost seems intentional.
So if a fascist goes on podcasts, the empty-brained populace has no choice but to vote for him?
I think the dipshits who were gonna vote for trump were gonna vote for him no matter where he appeared. The voters are to blame. The voters are not 6-year-olds. The voters are all adults capable of reasoning and capable of bearing guilt.
I doubt it was the sole purpose he won but I'm sure it swayed new voters to his direction. I think its safe to say the media has an influence on how people think and react.
What you say takes agency away from the voters. Voters have agency, responsibility and blame.
"The media has an influence" <- these statements, when repeated often, take the agency and responsibility away from the voters.
The voters voted, and are responsible for their votes.
What I'm saying is running a good media campaign influences public opinion and can help someone win elections. By going onto podcasts he was able to get his shitty views into more people's ears, and potential pitched alongside a host they already respect and trust. Strong media presences was also crucial for people like JFK and Hitler. Its nothing new the format is changing and democrats weren't keeping up with the format in terms of their media presence.