this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
690 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38150 readers
5244 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I felt it insisted upon itself.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 76 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think I like 4chan screenshots because of the timestamp.

Everything else is like “2 minutes ago” but it’s a screencap from 2014.

Even tells you the day of the week.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I absolutely hate fuzzy dates, not only because of the problem you mentioned, but also because they can get wildly inaccurate. For example, on youtube I often see something counted as posted a year ago, but if I look at the absolute timestamp, it was actually 1 year and 10 months. That's too big of a difference to truncate.

This shit is so annoying on GitHub. I feel like changes to a codebase are something that really makes sense to describe in hard dates and times. Telling me that some dumbass (me) introduced a bug "3 months ago" is not enough info, especially when it was actually 3 months and 24 days.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I absolutely hate fuzzy dates,

Fine, we will have oily dates.

[–] lillardfair@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I like my dates pitted

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a user friendly design.
2026-02-23 12:01 is so much 'harder' to parse at a glance than 1 minute ago.
Obviously this doesn't care about archival or screenshots, it's for the user looking at the live page.

I think it would be nice if sites offered option to toggle, but most have no reason for the extra investment.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

True, but maybe a good compromise would be having the fuzzy date in parentheses/brackets if there's enough space.

[–] mbp@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago

They did some things right over there. Not much, but some.

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

February 26, 2024…

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 89 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The book does a good job of showing how Vito built his organization bit by bit. He quietly amassed power without doing a lot of killing. He was feared, and that was enough.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The main things I remember from the book is the whole going to mattress thing being literal and how it had a legit arc about the mistress and her vagina deformation.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most people agree that the movie was much better than the book

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I won’t be reading that.

Can I get a tldr on the vagina deformation?

[–] coolie4@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In both the movie and the book, its mentioned that Sonny has a big penis.

In the book, the mistress stays in a toxic relation with him because her vagina is super wide (which she didn't realize was abnormal) and Sonny was the only man who could make her orgasm. Then there was some problematic stuff about a surgeon who realizes her problem and fixes it so that he could be the first to enjoy the new vagina.

In the movies, she ends up having a child, who is Andy Garcia's character in the third movie. Michael feels responsible for him because he finds out about this nephew he never knew he had.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Between leaving that out and the bit about young gigolos going to a party to bang a bunch of aging movie actresses, I have no idea how that movie works so well.

[–] Tehhund@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

tl;dr: the mistress's vagina was deformed.

(I also have not read it)

[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

You know who had an arc? Noah

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The mob boss: it's not how you kill, it's who you kill.

Like that old joke about the technician. $5 for the hammer. $1995 for knowing what to hit.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

The mob boss: it’s not how you kill, it’s who you kill.

And the timing of it all.

[–] loomi@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He was cunning because he almost always knew who would come at him and how. Not how he was going to kill somebody, although there was that.

almost always knew

I mean, he had no idea the shoot-up of his bedroom was coming. And he only found out about Fredo's betrayal because Fredo was an absolute fucking moron.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Who was going to come at him?

!Everyone!<

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 67 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, go try to outmaneuver five established crime families and coordinate a simultaneous attack in a way that none of them get a chance at retaliation. Let us know how that goes, then we can start understanding the levels to "cunning".

Edit- and aside from Sollozzo to avenge Vito, Michael didn't shoot anyone.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I've never gotten the mass appeal of The Godfather series, personally. But I like a lot of shit movies, so I can't pass judgement.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It was a leap forward in gangster movies. The genre had peaked in the 1920-30's, then it flipped to becoming more detective/police focused in the 1940's forward. The gangster film was fairly dead by the 70's. The entire vibe you think of as a modern 'gangster movie vibe' is The Godfather.

There's a lot of movies that don't exist without The Godfather coming first. Once Upon a Time in America (1984) was Sergio Leone's attempt to do the same sort of thing. Which was meant to be 2 movies. Goodfellas (1990) also borrows a lot, but gives a significantly faster pace to the storytelling. The gangster film was pretty much reborn anew, all in the wake of the success of The Godfather.

If you tried to make any sort of gangster movie today, you might not even realize you were borrowing from it. It's genre defining.

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

You forgot the cinematic masterpiece Mafia!

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 30 points 3 days ago

The movie really insists upon itself

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

I'm so over mafia movies in general.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To be frank, that's a lot fucking smarter than most villains who tell the good guys their entire plan or take hostages expecting to win them over.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I know the movie gets a lot of hate, but Watchmen is my favorite subversion of that cliche.

And also one of my favorite movies

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Everyone said the third one was shit. But it was the pentultimant consequence of Michael's success. He was all alone at the end, a victim of his own ruthlessness and success. It completed the arc.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

The third one was mostly ruined by the fact that Sofia Coppola couldn't act. The scenes between her and Andy Garcia were verging on painful to watch. But yes, the bits of the film that were about Michael were good, actually.

It is possible for a movie to both correctly complete an arc and also be shit.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

I never thought it was shit. For sure, it was the weakest of the three by a pretty good measure, but it does end the story decently enough. Plus, considering the success of the first two, there was nowhere to go but down with the third one!

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

Funny thing.

When you said 'the third one' I thought you were referring to Fredo.

But I see that you meant the third movie. Even re-editied, I don't want to see it.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

When you come to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Tuco Benedicto Pacífico Juan María Ramírez.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

You come at the king, you best not miss.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Great movie. Loved the shooting.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Well he was cunning compared to his brother James Caan.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Keep it simple, shithead