this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
923 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81772 readers
3374 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite building an increasingly screen-focused world, billionaire tech leaders are keeping their own children away from the tech they helped create.

As far back as 2010, Apple cofounder Steve Jobs told a New York Times reporter his kids had never used an iPad and that, “We limit how much technology our kids use at home.”

Since then, the trend of Silicon Valley billionaires keeping their families away from technology has become even more pronounced, thanks in part to the rise of social media and short-form video.

At the 2024 Aspen Ideas Festival, early Facebook investor and billionaire Peter Thiel joined Chen among the ranks of tech leaders who are setting strict limits on screens. Thiel said he only lets his two young children use screens for an hour-and-a-half per week, a revelation that prompted audible gasps from the audience.

Other tech CEOs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Snap’s Evan Spiegel, and Tesla’s Elon Musk, have also spoken about limiting their children’s access to devices. Gates has said he did not give his children smartphones until age 14 and banned phones at the dinner table entirely. Snap CEO Evan Spiegel, in 2018, said he limits his child to the same 1.5 hours per week of screen time as Thiel. And finally, Musk, who bought the social media company X, formerly Twitter, in 2022, said it “might’ve been a mistake” to not set any rules on social media for his children.

Yet, as the trials against social media companies continue and country after country moves toward legislating what Silicon Valley’s billionaires have quietly practiced for years, the private behavior of the world’s most powerful tech figures stands in contrast to what they’re promoting and building

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That should be enough evidence for the rest of the world…

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Duh. You think the CEO of Kraft feeds his kids mac and cheese from a box?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Never get high on your own supply

Fucking degenerate assholes, pushing drugs knowing full well how harmful it is.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

banned phones at the dinner table entirely

I would everyone is doing this. Sitting down to eat together once a day and talk isn't something only billionaires can afford.

[–] BiomedOtaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Lol I've always known this. People are beyond retarded now. Like biggie use to say

" Never get high on your own supply "

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago

That social rot you smell? It’s you. You’re the social rot.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What, Musks too? He's not known to have much to do with family.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

But he is known to talk out his ass

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Most Sociopathic Oligarchs see their offspring as future organ donors, so they can live forever. The Goblin DEFINITELY thinks like that. Those kids are livestock, nothing more.

[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First of all these billionaires can afford to replace for their kids; what social media is with actual socialising that is destroyed by fear, nimbyism, and systematic destruction of third places for normal people. that's what private cities and walled off estates are for. They will continue to enjoy the fruits of socialism while selling capitalism for everybody else.

This is not a force to be triffled with or dismissed as so easy to escape from.

[–] aloofPenguin@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

that’s what private cities and walled off estates are for

I would just like to add that there is a school (I think in California) that the rich sends their kids to, where electronic devices are prohibited (and access restricted I believe). Though from the video, it does look lie the interact with others outside of that circle.

Here's the video: YouTube Link

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Half an hour per weekday and an hour on weekends with the switch, plus strict rules on what als can be used. No roblox.

But we flood our kids with books or comics. If they want to read a book, well make it happen

Kids are fine with it. Boredom sparks creativity.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even when I was a kid, in the 80s and 90s, I spent plenty of time playing NES, computer and watching TV. This was of course long before social media.

I don’t see how you could possibly limit a kid to 1.5 hr screen time per week. How do we define screen time? If it’s only social media on phones or tablets, then that’s probably okay. But if you are including console, computer gaming, tv, then I don’t see how that’s even possible. (And of course now most games have an online component, so the line gets blurry there.)

It’s the shitty “social” aspect of online that is harming children, not the concept of a screen.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I think social media and any game with micro transactions. We got the kids the switch, because with Nintendo, there are no shitty loot boxes or buy diamonds to skip time shit.

The hard truth is, games are way more addictive than in out youth. And parents need to deal with that and guide kids to good games

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And finally, Musk, who bought the social media company X, formerly Twitter, in 2022, said it “might’ve been a mistake” to not set any rules on social media for his children.

That would require him to spend more time around his children than photoshoots and using them as human shields

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago

Tech lords are among the most hated people on the planet.

"Dad, why people think you're a self absordeb, pathetic, nazi snowflake???"

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

How cute. They think the things billionaires say for ammo in the evential lawsuit are actually true.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

the American guy who has been pushing for chat control through Europe so he can get paid destroying all privacy and spying on all European citizens through his Palintir, you mean, and ultimately delivering all power to the US.

it takes a certain kind of evil to literally recreate Sauron's Palintir. What is it Gandalf tells Saruman?, "There is only one Lord of the Ring, only one who can bend it to his will. And he does not share power." He is literally following the script lol.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago

Theil reproduced?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Why do they have kids? Inheritance Tax Now!

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Nothing to do with any virtue to be interested in their kid’s mental health and everything to do with avoiding getting blackmail using their kid’s identities

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Goddamn, it reproduced already?

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Of course you do hey do but millions of us keep eating the shit they put in front of us, me included.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

Listen, billionaires suck. But if you think tech giants are hypocritical for strictly rationing screen time to their children then you have lost the plot.

Social media, and screen time in general, are bad for you. Everyone knows this now. If you aren't limiting your child's access, that's on you.

Before a child can get addicted, their parents have to give them access. If you can't live life without looking at a phone, TV, or tablet every free moment, then you're the reason your kids are turning into morons.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

My son was never interested in video games, nor does he use any social media. Instead, he reads and watches movies.

He's a film studies student, and knows films inside and out because he's seen almost everything, from every country, from every era. He's also an avid reader of classics, and just finished Moby Dick. It wasn't an assignment, he just wanted to read it.

He wouldn't be that smart if he'd buried himself in video games and social media.

[–] wobblyunionist@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago

I imagine this us more about protecting their kids developing brains from being dopamine addicted gooners than concerns about their data or privacy

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›