this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
129 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

81661 readers
4252 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

original, saw this somewhere else too. ddos stuff. this one blames ru for archive.today mess. sounds about right. didn' intend it to look like an announcement here. it kind of does, sorry. post based on ars story, apparently. who knows

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

As someone who uses Bypass Paywalls Clean, this is so frustrating.

Bypass Paywalls Clean was chased off of the Firefox Add-Ons site, chased off of Gitlab, and chased off of Github via DMCA takedown notices for copyright infringement. It is now hosted on the Russian Gitflic.ru.

We all know Russia sucks in a litany of ways, but one way it doesn't suck is that it is one of the few countries left that has really thrown all caution to the wind and absolutely said "fuck it" in terms of respecting the international Big Copyright norms as promoted by and deeply influenced by the USA copyright cabal (RIAA/MPAA).

We have spent the better part of two decades dealing with the DMCA being used as an outright weapon to silence information that corporations and government find inconvenient mostly because that information is wildly incriminating for them. It works especially strongly because a large amount of the world's internet has been consolidated to the US and its vast hosting structures like AWS and Cloudflare, putting enormous amounts of the internet under the direct influence of US laws like the DMCA.

Websites like Anna's Archive, Libgen, and Sci-Hub live because they use hosting in countries that allow them to bypass these kind of restrictions. Russia is one of the most common countries for them to host the data out of due to the lack of enforcement of copyright laws, although it is obviously not the only country that these sites use.

Until we are able to alter international copyright protections to be reasonable instead of their current over-zealously and aggressively abusive nature, we will all suffer having to risk hosting of such sites in countries that are otherwise very unsavory for be associating with.

We live in the kind of world early piracy pioneers such as the original creators of The Pirate Bay were trying to fight from becoming a reality. The American copyright cabal fought tooth and nail to change Sweden's interpretations of copyright law so they could send these men to prison.

[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 hour ago

Good reminder to donate to web.archive.org

[–] dan@upvote.au 21 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

This is understandable, but at the same time, none of the anti-paywall lists are as good as archive.today. They actually have paid accounts at a bunch of paywalled sites, and use them when scraping.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 38 points 1 hour ago

Unfortunately, they’ve allegedly modified the contents of some archived articles, so even though they may do better to archive, nothing archived is of any value because it cannot be trusted.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

https://lemmy.world/c/ukraine was where i saw this. i didn't write it. thought lemmy would have linked to the original, was wrong. FYI

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 hour ago

Democracy died in daylight, the darkness hides the rotten body.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Bro any archiving/scraping tool can be used for ddos u just tell it to archive the same site over and over and now u have a different IP spamming the endpoint

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

In this case, their CAPTCHA page intentionally included code to DoS a particular blog, sending a request to search for a random string every 300ms (search is very CPU-intensive). This was regardless of the archived site you were trying to view.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 8 points 1 hour ago

Any good archiver will check for an archived copy before making a request, and batch requests. This was very different than the attack you’re imagining — if you opened any archive.today page, it would poll a developer’s personal blog, regardless of whether you were interacting with content from that blog.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

don't know all the details. fyi basically. i forget where i saw the same site mentioned for the same thing. don't call me bro Bro

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -2 points 1 hour ago (4 children)

Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that he only did this in response to a malicious dox attempt.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 24 minutes ago

He only modified archived pages in response to a dox attempt?

And the thing is, the discovery of the modified pages revealed that it wasn’t even the first time he’d modified pages. And he used a real person’s identity to try and shift blame.

Irrespective of the doxxing allegations, if he’s done all this multiple times already, it means the page archives can’t be trusted AND there’s no guarantee that anything archived with the service will be available tomorrow.

Seems like we need to switch to URLs that contain the SHA256 of the page they’re linking to, so we can tell if anything has changed since the link was created.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 41 minutes ago

It wasn't a dox attempt though. The blog just collected information that was already publicly available on other sites.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As they should since it doesn't matter.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

Yeah, someone being shitty to you doesn't mean go you full-fledged shitty in return, it kind of proves your lack of trustworthiness to begin with. It's like Nazis being like "leftists were mean to me by explaining how my politics made me a Nazi, so I'm gonna show them by Nazi-ing even harder! They forced me to be like this!" It kind of betrays the argument that the reason you got that way was because leftists were mean to you.

[–] Anon518@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 minutes ago

Unfortunately, they shot themselves in the foot by responding the way they did. They basically did the job of anyone who wants them taken down and not trusted. It was probably the worst way they could have reacted. Such a tragedy to lose such a valuable website.