I want to trust young programmers to not abuse AI but deep down I know the answer, and so do you
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
127 points (88.5% liked)
Fuck AI
5751 readers
1334 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You tell people they can turn their brain off and trust the AI enough and they might just start doing it.
I’m sure there will be some that won’t. But it will probably be a shockingly small number of them that care enough to not.
This change is about preventing AI from trying to own the change. A human must own the change.
AI cannot own a Firefox contribution. AI cannot commit code to Firefox. Only a human may do that.
If a human uses AI (or autocomplete / a formatter / a transpiler / whatever else) to help them author code, that doesn't devolve them of responsibility. The human must take ownership and responsibility for the output.
For example, if we later run git-blame on a section of the code, we want to see the human that took responsibility for the code, not some AI.
Firefox's policy on AI code: https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/contributing/ai-coding.html
Perfect way honestly. Same philosophy we follow. I don't care how you made the PR, you're responsible for it and you need to be able to defend and explain it. If we get a "I don't know, chatGPT told me this" reject.
That... Sounds like a good change actually??
Wait just a minute, that sounds... reasonable?
This won't do! I've already fetched my pitchfork and ignited my torch!
I'm convinced the Brave shills have been posting Firefox misinformation for years
How many human eyes of experienced programmers will have looked at the code?
A whoopsie in the web browser is significantly worse than in an... I don't know... than in a vibe-coded so-called "AI" framework/social network. /s
That's good news! Thanks for looking into it.
Side note, Firefox now has AI settings you have to manually turn off on it's settings.
JFC is the new CEO a plant to burn the browser to the ground?
I would believe you if you told me that. There's not much else to explain it other than incompetence (which I suspect is the actual reason).
I'm really going to miss Firefox
While I think that this isn't on target, I believe it to be mis-executed rather than misguided: I think they were trying to support their AI Coding Policy by removing any notion that Claude was responsible for the work (therefore leaving the human responsible). What it does in practice of course is just hide AI-generated code. Since the commit setting can be anything you want, I believe a disclaimer that the commit was assisted by Claude but that the committer is considered the author of the code would be a better choice (and I said so on the thread). I hope they improve their choice.
Is there any browser engine left? Servo maybe?
If the engine starts getting crappy because of these LLMs, I think the internet enshittified to the maximum.
I have used firefox since it was netscape, so it was a bit sad when I switched to waterfox after they made the bullshit AI announcement. I'm hoping something better comes along but I have little faith it will happen.
I stopped using Firefox because it was slowly becoming a bug filled mess. It's in the trash with chrome for me now
What do you use now?
Likely a Chromium fork made by two teenagers larping as security experts, or a guy trying to sell you NFTs in a very brave manner.
Vivaldi, EU made, fuck AI by default
Please don't recommend propriety software
Well, in the case of Vivaldi "proprietary soft" is pretty relative. A small part of it's unique UI is proprietary of Vivaldi, but full auditable, means source available not closed source, even modificable by the user (they show you how, at own risk naturally). There is nothing shady in Vivaldi. employee owned cooperative in Norway.
- Without limiting the foregoing, you are neither allowed to (a) adapt, alter, translate, embed into any other product or otherwise create derivative works of, or otherwise modify the Software ; (b) separate the component programs of the Software for use on different computers; (c) reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to derive the source code for the Software, except as permitted by applicable law; or (d) remove, alter or obscure any proprietary notices on the Software or the applicable documentation therein.
https://vivaldi.com/privacy/vivaldi-end-user-license-agreement/
Having some source code does not mean it's free software
I use Vivaldi and it's miles better than default chrome or Firefox, but it is still chromium.
There's also edge, or opera. But, Vivaldi is nice for its blockers + note taking
Better than Firefox?
- uBlock Origin works best on Firefox
- Add-on index, with most of them open source
- Add-ons on mobile
That's enough for me
Firefox has gotten corrupted multiple times for me with normal use, to the point it wasn't worth it. Specifically the user profile.
Ublock is great though.
use whatever you want
Was this linked to a specific report or something? I cannot reach it. Does someone have a backup?
ill no longer use firefox now... i think vivaldi is better
Please don’t recommend propriety software
Well i didnt know vivaldi wasnt foss... then ill give librewolf a shot, i have it installed too.