Look, as much as I think people should be taking transit and bikes as much as possible, for the developer not to provide a single parking lot for a building that size is silly.
Edit: I meant to say "single parking spot" not lot.
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Look, as much as I think people should be taking transit and bikes as much as possible, for the developer not to provide a single parking lot for a building that size is silly.
Edit: I meant to say "single parking spot" not lot.
Is that sillier than forcing people who are not interested in owning a car to get a place with parking spots anyway? Because that’s where we are today. It is hard to find a building like this, and I’d love it.
So don't rent that specific condo if you have a car. It is supposed to be an affordable development and cars are expensive. Many people who need affordable housing the most don't own a car and the land close to transit and bike lanes should be prioritized for them instead of cars.
Parking is tough in Montreal. If you're building a condo, you should provide room on the property for parking for the residents.
That's not how to urbanize in Montréal in 2025 . As the article says it's in an area where you have public transport, bike lanes and everything is accessible within walking distance. It's the people that want to have a car and also live in a densely populated area that take up too much space.