this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
601 points (96.4% liked)

politics

28796 readers
2141 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I won't be voting for her, but only because she isn't authentic or left enough. We need real change.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We have certainly, the question is whether our voices will be listened to and empowered or not... and that is much harder to be optimistic about.

The average person in the US I think has changed a lot, you can see it in the way that Trump didn't even try to sell the Iran War, people don't want it and will tear any excuse Trump or his bullshit administration tries to stick to up into shreds and so they see no point in even trying. That feels cynical but on the flipside it also exposes their desperation, the US public is not biting when it is supposed to be biting and as hopeless as we all feel right now that does mean something, it means something big is changing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Please do! But, let's have a completely fair primary with lots of other great candidates to choose amongst as well.

[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah well, last week she gave her kiss of death to Crockett in the Dem Senate primary in TX. And I think Crockett, had she been nominated, would have gone on to lose in November...so all the better.

But it would be interesting to see how the numbers would differ without Harris' endorsement.

[–] Scirocco@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Crockett is doing great work already, in her district where we have reasonable hope she will stay in office.

A statewide run would be much more challenging.

[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I don't get why people are saying, "no" in here. Let her run, we will get to check out all the options and decide in primaries. I don't see anything wrong with that.

[–] Inkstainthebat@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not from the US but I can see how her running would also end up hindering any other more progressive candidates by dividing the voter pool, due to the crappy FPTP system the US has in place

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Please don’t.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m just going to say right now that I won’t vote for her, not even for supposed harm reduction purposes. Democrats have to do better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Jfc they really gonna make me vote for the pig sympathizer again?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Of course she will. That's the plan. They are a team, this is how they support their fascist buddies.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›