I somehow....didn't fall for these?
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
1083 points (99.0% liked)
Funny
14094 readers
1875 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That scam exists because of all the deregulation. With proper regulation all the people pushing NFTs would have had to pay back all they stole.
I used to think Bitcoin was a ponzi scheme. I still do, dut I used to, too
"Today it is worth $155."
LMAO. No.
Yea ... I agree, it really REALLY isn't worth $155.
If it was easy to buy, I would pay $5 for this thing, so I could tell the three people in my life that would be amused by my owning it. That's the floor on the market, for this particular one - so it still has a long way to fall.
Can confirm, I took one look at NFTs back in 2021 and immediately said "that's fucking stupid."
It's like a tax on stupidity.
$155 looks a little high to be honest.
The very idea of NFTs were wild. You don't own a physical image, you own something kind of like a copyright to an image but you don't in fact own the actual copyright. But it's gonna cost you alot of money and somehow make you even more money someday.
You own a sign with a link to the image.
And there isn't even a guarantee that link will work in perpetuity.
Odd, I always thought they were a means to launder your money.
But the Metaverse!!!!
the Pauls so thier grift was dying "targeting children for views" so they pivoted to maga.
Is that Lauren Chen, the Russian agent?
Wouldn't even pay for his jaw repairs these days
no one else going to point out that Logan Paul is somehow not the worst person in that picture
For anyone wondering, she's a conservative influencer who worked with BlazeTV, Toilet Paper USA, contributed opinion pieces to RT and, unsurprisingly, has ties to the Russian government.
More specifically, she and her husband founded tenet media, who ACTUALLY FOR REALS laundered Russian money to shitheads like Tim pool and Dave rubin.
What an indictment of our society that this fuck ass ever had that much money and now has more
His net worth is over 2 billion now. It's revolting.
Where are you seeing such a high figure? This article from 2025 says $150 million. I know he has Celsius and wrestling but 2 billion seems like BS
I also saw $150 million, which is more than he deserves but it's mostly because of ownership. Wealth snowballs so even if you make terrible life decisions after the initial investments, you usually come out with even more money.
How the hell is it even worth $155?
He's really good at scamming people
Isn't it worth exactly what the highest bidder will pay? Where would the $155 number come from? Seems like an NFT famously owned by Logan Paul would sell for more than $155 anyway. Not saying he'd make a profit here...
No, literally nobody cares so nobody’s going to pay.
Believe me, there's a guy out there willing to pay $250
Hurr-durrrr!
(Said the guy)
Nah, it’s genius. A fantastic way to laundry money. It’s like buying paintings but you don’t even need to pay someone to appraise it or a good painter with some sort of good technique.
Yeah, but do paintings typically lose almost all of their value? I thought the idea was that the value should either stay the same or go up.
Either way, in this case, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.
The point here is say you are in business with X party but it's illegal. X party can buy an nft worth nothing or generate one. You buy the NFT for the amount of your bill with X party. You've now technically not paid them for whatever illegal thing, instead you bought an nft from them. You could also break this down into multiple NFTs, buying 100 $100 NFTs from various "owners" that don't link back to X party through shell companies, and you've now paid them $10,000 "for pictures of chimps".
NFTs only exist for money laundering and illicit transfers. Once they've been transferred their value no longer matters, the business has been done.
Thank you! Now for the first time, i finally see the slightest sense in NFTs. I really didn't get it from the start. I heard various explanations and they never made any sense to me. Left me confused every time until now.
Its just a mask for a deal in the background. Ok now i get it.
Yep.
My buddy once went to a farmer’s market where they weren’t allowed to sell beer, but they were allowed to give it away. So he did the oldest trick in the book: scooped up a bunch of rocks in a box, put up a sign that said “Rocks $5,” and “Free beer with purchase of rock.”
NFTs are just the rock.
load more comments
(3 replies)
For Logan Paul, yes, he wanted it to go up.
But if this painting was laundering at work, the important part is that the seller can point to this transaction as "real". The IRS or the FBI might be looking into his sudden gains of half a million dollars, but when they do, they find that he sold Logan Paul half a million dollars of art.
The NFT part makes it incredibly easy to generate said art. Before NFTs, rich people would mark up paintings, and those had to go up in value, because they would buy them at 100,000$ and sell them for 200,000$, so the government would see 100,000$ of profit, but the next guy with the painting, he'd have to sell it for 300,000, claiming 100,000$ in profit, and the next guy, 400,000$, you get the idea.
NFTs can lose value in a way real art isnt allowed to because anyone can claim that's the price, and after the sale, they can be discarded as trash, essentially. New ones can be made in bulk for no effort, and its alright to sell 1000 NFTs at 100$ each, because you can just keep making them and "selling" them and no one has to care about their value in the same way because they're mass producible without that crashing the market.
It is also important to mention that you don't actually own any art with NFTs. You own a link pointing to the art, but the art itself is not owned by the owner of the NFT.
I don't think that's actually all that important. It's fundamental to an understanding of NFTs, but not their role in any sort of money-laundering, since you can also just make NFTs using some AI-generated art or make 5000 NFT's from one low-effort art you do own.
All money laundering needs is the non-fungible part, which is easy to do, just stamp the corner with a limited-edition numbering mark and the 500 fungible digital tokens of a single art become 500 nonfungible tokens.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Terrible investment. That was probably like 2 months of his income.
His annual income is estimated at around $20 Million, so it was probably less.
Also you can write realized losses off of your taxes.
Or it wasn't. Very possible he was simply gifted the NFT and lied about the price.
A bunch of the early 20s NFT sales were wash sales
I kinda wish NFTs were still somewhat popular, they were such an effective indicator for the dumbest people alive.
oh throw up its lauren chen
view more: next ›