this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

Memes

52635 readers
609 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

You can't compare these 2 conflicts at all.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I've seen so many stupid takes today, and this is one of them. The conflicts aren't similar!

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ukraine is simply more important to the countries bordering russia, the EU and it's allies

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ukraine is a sovereign nation that got attacked by another country.

Palestine just carried out a horrible attack on Israel. Plus the history of Israel and Palestine is totally different. It's just apples and oranges. I'm not claiming in any way Israel is right here, but Hamas is definitely scum of the Earth.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id consectetur dolore eiusmod culpa.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hurr durr, now that a palestinian terrorist group is attacking is the best moment to be vocal about palestinian freedom

And you people wonder why you get downvoted?

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You're telling on yourself. You genuinely don't give a shit about the Palestinian struggle. You just want them to sit down and take their genocide.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Perhaps they could sit down when it comes to killing innocent civvies and stick to military targets. I have always been outspoken in Palestine’s favor but lines were crossed and nobody should support it.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id consectetur dolore eiusmod culpa.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Idk if this is a hot take, but imo the war in Ukraine is pretty clear city while the Palestinian and Israeli conflict his an infinite list of wrinkles and nuances.

It's far less controversial to say the former is Russia's fault than it is to say the latter is either Palestine's or Israel's fault.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id consectetur dolore eiusmod culpa.

[–] Ineocla@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah mostly because isreal/ Palestine conflict is much older then russia/Ukraine so a lot of things happened. But at it's very core they both started because of the same claim : russia claimed used to own Ukraine so they want it back. The jews used to own Palestine so they want it back. So if you support Ukraine and isreal you're just a hypocrite

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

I haven't seen anyone here "support Israel". Almost everyone agrees that the Israeli State is not free of guilt, far from it.

What people really disagree over is whether that alone makes Palestine right (nuanced) and whether it justifies Hamas' actions (unhinged but unfortunately semi-common take on here).

[–] absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What nuance is there be had about this? Israel is a settler-colonial apartheid state that deserves what should've happened to America when those settlers were doing it. That's like saying "the civil rights conflict has an infinite list of wrinkles and nuances"; in that it's objectively wrong.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Palestinian conflict is very simple: an army vs civilians. Only gonna end when all the latter are dead.

Should we ever try to sanction that army? Never! Should we try sanctioning US for killing million iraqis who had not a WMD? No! Should we sanction Nato for bombing the wealthiest african estate libya to it's ruin? Ah wait, WE are Nato. Can't shoot own ankle.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems like both armies versus civilians.

There's not many other conflicts where I can remark "two war crimes don't make a right" damn near every time.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Hamas is a militia. They don't have an airforce and whatever else is required to be a military.

I'd urge you to compare the casualties caused by each of the "armies". Hamas is not even a fraction of the concern that Israel is.

[–] sheppard@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is much more nuanced. Both countries' current heads of state are kinda like "all this land is my country's, the other country should not exist." It's unclear who is right.

The Russo-Ukranian conflict is clear. One leader is claiming the land of the other, the other just want it back. Ukraine's government is not claiming half of Russia.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Unclear who is right"

No it's pretty clear, out with the colonizer government. How is this a question?

[–] reverendz@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It isn’t that nuanced. The colonized, subjugated population is rising up rather than laying down to continue getting slaughtered.

Liberate Palestine.

[–] absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

From the river to the sea

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's more propoganda than nuance.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Lets have some nuance" people on their way to defend Nazi war criminals

[–] Saarth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There is nuance to Ukraine Russia war too. Yes Russia is the obvious aggressor, and strengthened secession movements in eastern Ukraine through propaganda, but there were always some ethnically Russian people living there who felt they belong more with Russia.

They, along with the help of Russia were leading some kind of separatist movement and Ukraine bombed their own citizens to quel this issue. It's hard to tell amidst all the propaganda on both sides, but there is definitely nuance here. Also not to mention Ukraine flirting with NATO membership was apparently a red line for Putin.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id consectetur dolore eiusmod culpa.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

all this land is my country's, the other country should not exist.

One of those countries is an ethno-religious state that is exclusive of the other. Can you guess which one?

If you are an ethno-religious exclusivist who says "your country shouldn't exist only mine!" and I am a country that multi-religious, and say "actually my country should be the prevailing one, not your exclusivist one", you gotta realize those two are massively different, unlike you portray.

The Russo-Ukranian conflict is clear. One leader is claiming the land of the other

Russia's original pretext for the war is not about territorial gains. It was supposedly regarding Ukraine's attack on Donetsk, Luhansk, and ethnic Russian populations in general (such as the Odessa massacre), what they also called "de-nazification" of the Ukrainian government, and Ukraine's bid to join NATO. This is easily verifiable, but I can provide you a sources on this if you doubt me.

I am not claiming what Russia is saying is true, but it is not what you make it seem to make your argument.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I get that there is lot more nuances than russo-ukrainian, but imo there is a lot more similarities than you seem to imply : both Russia and Israel claimed that the land belonged to them before, that they should get it back, and use violence to kill local people who tried to resist or move them. The only difference is that Israel did it with the help of western countries and partially according to their laws, so they get like an aura of legitimity, but the acts remains quite close.

I do not like when people basically do not accept violent behavior but accepts them when they are allowed by some law or authority.

(Also yes Hamas is doing bad things and should be held accountable in some way, just like Ukraine to my eyes. But still, for me it remains obvious who kills more, who steals more, who oppresses more)

[–] ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It’s unclear who is right.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-184195/

  1. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for their independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;

Seems pretty clear.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Edit: removed implied support for Hamas. Both militaries should burn. Hope for a quick end to the conflict for the sake of the civilians affected.

[–] Magrath@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At the end of the day who is Isreal and who Palestine. If no one who was alive when Palestine was around can anyone rightfully claim it the land belongs to "Palestine". It's like the ship Theseus or something. Maybe I'm just dumb as fuck.

Just make the fuck up and work together instead of being greedy bigots.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

can anyone rightfully claim it the land belongs to "Palestine"

You should tell that to Israel, which is expelling Palestinians from this land every week for decades. It is not the Palestinians who are claiming the land exclusively to themselves and expelling others from it. It is Israel doing that. I find it crazy that you somehow argue this as if Palestine is doing that.

[–] Anduin1357@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Palestinians lost the wars. Multiple wars. At this point there really isn't a point in contesting against Israel when they can integrate with Israel peacefully instead.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Israel is not offering "peaceful integration". Have a look at Palestinians who already live outside of Gaza, in the rest of occupied Palestine. The only choices are leave, suffer or resist.

[–] Anduin1357@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Palestinians don't offer peaceful integration either, since they like to resist so much as a group that Israelis don't know who they can trust.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your sentence doesn't make sense. Moreover, the Palestinian stance of most groups has been integration and living together peacefully and happily. "Resisting" their expulsion and the murder against them does not contradict that.

[–] Anduin1357@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Clearly they're only happy and peaceful with themselves. I wonder why they refuse to move when they're so clearly unhappy with the communities that surround them.