this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11715 readers
521 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Timely. Health Canada used to second guess the FDA, but now they are rubber stamping FDA approvals of insanely expensive drugs that don't work.
I'm a biomedical researcher who works with biotechs, drug companies and I have yet to understand what the 10,000 people who work at Health Canada actually do. We even started allowing drug marketing to consumers which is illegal in Canada.

Quebec has had enough and started refusing to pay for $400,000/yr drugs that do nothing.

Similarly, HC approved Leqembi, which is not only ineffective, but can lead to brain hemorrhage. . But the CDN formulary is refusing to pay, so why did HC approve it?

Canada is spending over $45B/yr on drugs, many of the most expensive do actually nothing. But the governments (all of them last 25 years) refuse to invest in CDN-based drug discovery and would rather pay US corporations.

Canada Healthcare spending: $372B a year, $45B of that on drugs.

CIHR total budget, for all diseases, including cancer, $1.4B. 0.26% . THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF STUPID.

Carney is spending like a drunk sailor on war machines, but next to nothing on biomedical research. Trudeau was even worse, in the middle of a pandemic, he cut budgets by not even keeping with inflation.

SMA is a rare disease (1 in 10,000) , but the treatment for one patient is $2.4M, and Canada won't fund a single researcher on this disease.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some places are OK to take guidance from... just not the USA.
Guidance. Not rubber stamp. E.g. "The UK thinks this is OK. Let's look at the evidence and decide if we agree. "

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some places are OK to take guidance from… just not the USA.

Very quietly, the FDA fired one of their directors last November for trying to solicit bribes. Not a Trump thing, this was going on before Trump.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And they caught and fired him. Under Trump he'd get a promotion. Though I do agree the FDA has been crap for a while, well before Trump. It's been a Bayer rubber stamp for decades.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because it was cheaper to rubber stamp based on US rubber stamping.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that they'd be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide. Maybe not too surprised I guess...money talks.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I’m surprised that they’d be less rigourous, especially after thalidomide

They are careful to not approve dangerous drugs, but they are approving drugs that don't work.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Cheaper on paper, they were an utter pain in the ass sometimes.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Let's not even look at the FDA data.