this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
694 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

82494 readers
5112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Performing Right Society (PRS) has "commenced legal proceedings" against Steam owner Valve over the use of its members' works on Steam "without permission."

The organization claims that while games right across the spectrum use music to "transform play into emotional, immersive experiences," Valve has "never obtained a licence for its use of the rights managed by PRS on behalf of its members, comprising songwriters, composers, and music publishers."

PRS claims "many game titles which incorporate PRS members' musical works are made available on Steam," including "high profile series" such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

PRS said that as it had sought to work with Valve about the licensing issues "for many years without appropriate engagement from Valve," it has now issued legal proceedings under the UK's s20 Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 and requires any game that uses PRS' works to obtain a licence.

"The litigation will progress unless Valve Corporation engages positively with discussions and takes the necessary license to cover the use of PRS repertoire, both retrospectively and moving forwards," the organization said in a press statement.

Dan Gopal, chief commercial officer, PRS for Music said: "Our members create music that enhances experiences and PRS exists to protect the value of their work with integrity, transparency, and fairness. Legal proceedings are not a step we take lightly, but when a business’s actions undermine those principles, we have a duty to act.

"Great video games rely on great soundtracks, and the songwriters and creators behind them deserve to have their contribution recognised and fairly valued."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 1 hour ago

But the game publishers already had licence, and if they didn't have a licence then their beef is with the publishers not the storefront.

Anyway I've bought GTA V from physical brick and mortar stores in the past, so are they going to start suing the brick and mortar stores as well?

Hopefully they lose this case because copyright law is an absolute joke. It hasn't been fit for purpose for about 20 years.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Once again reminding people that you can sue anyone for anything. Doesn't mean it'll go anywhere

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 27 points 8 hours ago

Huh? The game studios pay the licenses, the artists etc. Why on earth would you then hold the store accountable? This is double dipping. That's like charging a CD store for selling your CDs.

This shit is why the music industry is despised.

[–] davitz@lemmy.ca 24 points 10 hours ago

The price might not be worth it, but would be really funny if Valve just delisted the claimed games in the UK and notified the publishers that they need to remove the claimed music or resolve the licensing issue if they want their game back up. Instead of one tidy lawsuit, suddenly these guys are being contacted by the angry lawyers of hundreds of orgs they have existing contracts with.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Rothschild loses their lawsuit against Valve and instantly Valve gets more troll lawsuits against them. What are the odds.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Sounds like they want to get paid twice.

[–] villainy@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

What's the VPN uptake in the UK these days, considering the state of government restrictions and surveillance lately? If Valve just said fuck it and pulled out of the market, would they even take a financial hit? Or would most of that revenue magically shift to other countries/currencies?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 16 hours ago

My hate of the copyright-ownership side of Hollywood / Nashville / Atlanta, etc. has been burning white hot since the days that the RIAA was suing people using P2P networks. But, I had to admit that at least they could probably make a valid claim for copyright infringement. But this?!

It's interesting how it's the "Performing Right Society" (which I've never heard of). The "performing" part of that suggests that maybe they have an issue with people sharing clips containing music, or live streaming games where they share music. But, again, why Valve? Sure, people can share clips with friends. And, occasionally you see developers streaming their games. But, nobody is really "performing" live streams on Steam. I suspect they just think Valve is rich and so they can strong-arm them and Valve will settle to make them go away. I hope they bit off more than they can chew. Valve is indeed rich, and they have a tendency to be stubborn. I think they might well fight, and fight hard.

I wish a possible outcome was that the PRS ceased to exist. But, I suspect they're like a flea or something, and even if you knock them off from this attempt to suck someone's blood, you can't kill them, and they'll just find another victim.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they going to sue to operating system owners next? What about the web browser that offers the steam installer download?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

why stop there! lets go after keyboard manufacturers for allowing people to type words.

[–] mghackerlady@leminal.space 4 points 6 hours ago

Or the dastardly USB Implementers Forum, who not only creates devices that allows those keyboards to function but a storage protocol commonly used by pirates!

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 61 points 1 day ago

This kind of lawsuit only makes things worse for musicians who are already struggling with making money performing and recording. This will be challenged, beaten and leave a bad image for artists as not everyone is going to draw logical conclusions from it.

It’s not about artists anyway despite their claim, it’s about labels. The artists doing well are doing their own thing recording, touring, selling merchandise and making sure their followers are getting value for money. The traditional labels are losing control the same way the magazines did.

[–] TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library not licensing a sample correctly

[–] balp@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago

That’s like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library not licensing a sample correctly

No actually, it's like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library licensing a sample correctly.

Not that they like money from Steam despite the games having a licence for the music. If I read the article right.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is the type of thing that pushes developers towards AI music generators and similar tools.

Being a piece of shit human being should be enough disbar lawyers.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

what's sad is that I don't think as many musicians even benefit as much from this as well ... just the companies ...

[–] commander@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago

These idiotic lawsuits. First of all, this isn't even Valves responsibility. Second, Steam/Valve are small frys compared to Amazon/Apple/Google/Microsoft. In gaming they may be smaller than Sony and Nintendo and those two have full on closed software platforms. Steam is one software store among many on Windows, Linux, and MacOS. All these groups want to enshittify PC gaming. They want to enshittify personal computing in general. Turn pre-iPhone smartphone operating systems into iOS

[–] d3adpaul77@lemmy.org 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

everybody attacking Valve, maybe my tin foil hat is too cozy but it;s a concerted effort by the psychopathic elite to ruin our lives. may their glans be afflicted by a million paper cuts and a salty storm

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

there's legitimate complaints against valve, but I don't think this is one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like they should get a committee of people together who understand how technology works before they start making laws about it

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh they do, at a great expense, and the committee writes a very long detailed document about why their idea is pants on head crazy, which of course they don't like, so they ignore the committee and then they do it anyway.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

But that would make sense and be an effective way of making laws and governing and more importantly would stop those who haven't meaningfully added to society from being able to easily profit from it in a way that others can't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 41 points 1 day ago

all they do is demonstrate why no game should use licensed music ever. cant stream of make videos of those games either without having to worry about this shit.

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, big AI vacuums up the entirety of music produced by everyone from piracy sites for profit and noone bats an eye

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There have been so many lawsuits against Valve recently from so many different angles. I'm not usually one for conspiracy but I wouldn't be shocked if this is a coordinated campaign to unseat Valve from their monopoly on the PC gaming market so that other games industry corporations can move in. They've been trying and failing to break into this market for years because Valve has built so much consumer loyalty.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago

If it isn't publicly traded, they can't take over it, enshitify it, and squeeze it until it's useless. So of course they hate it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Isn't this kind of like suing blockbuster over music in the films they rent? Seems a bit daft, but there must be a reason they think it might succeed.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It seems similar to the idea that you could sue Google for copyright infringement because it serves a website that infringes copyright. Like… valve just serves the content and facilitates sale, right? The act of infringement wasn’t committed by them, it was committed by the game developers. Am I mistaken?

[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

From what I understand, the music was used under licence by the game developers. The plaintiffs want Steam to also pay them for a licence to offer the game, which is already legally using the music, on their store, which is absurd.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

I think ever since Valve fought through their first lawsuit with Sierra and lucked out with them finding evidence showing destruction of evidence, they probably developed zero appetite to fold for frivolous lawsuits lol.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shouldn't they be suing the game publishers not the reseller?

So EA and Microsoft according to their docket?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No because they have a license to use the music already. They are seeking the equivalent of performance rights from Steam. They are extortionists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (25 children)

"The litigation will progress until Valve obeys" sounds an awful lot like extortion.

They are clearly trying to double/triple dip on shit that already been paid for and licensed.

Whats next?

Make us individual game owners pay license every time we download and install the game?

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 113 points 1 day ago (14 children)

I feel like by this logic Amazon and Walmart would also need to obtain lisences to sell video games that have music in them...

That or I'm too tired and bread dead to understand the stupid shit I just read.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 393 points 1 day ago (29 children)

PRS claims "many game titles which incorporate PRS members' musical works are made available on Steam," including "high profile series" such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

Insanity. It's like suing a grocery shop for selling the xyz branded milk for using their copyrighted font.

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›