this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
100 points (93.1% liked)

politics

28883 readers
2380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The FBI warned police departments in California in recent days that Iran could retaliate for American attacks by launching drones at the West Coast, according to an alert reviewed by ABC News.

“We recently acquired information that as of early February 2026, Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United State Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran,” according to the alert distributed at the end of February. “We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack.”

The warning came just as the Trump administration launched its ongoing assault against the Islamic Republic. Iran has been retaliating with drone strikes against targets throughout the Mideast.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gee that would be awful if they attacked us for attacking them 😩😩😩

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Got to say I am glad I live in one of the least populated states and very unlikely to suffer from a foreign attack. Used to live near Boston, always figured if the nukes dropped I'd be in the first wave of casualties lol. Now I'll just have to deal with all the nuclear fallout etc... a slower more painful death! Wahoo!

[–] SidTheShuckle@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Man why tf cali? Also that doesnt sound possible. Iran has a better chance attacking the east coast

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

And also wtf are local police supposed to do about it lol. Shit might randomly blow up. Anywhere. Any time. Maybe. Lol

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Maybe they think all the data centres are there?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

According to google maps it's about 7200 miles to hit the east coast or 7800 miles to hit the west coast.

So yeah technically closer but surprisingly close.

Plus going for west coast is mostly over ocean or China so less US military bases that would maybe be able to intercept it.

[–] pfr@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rooting for Iran here. Not sorry. America is a bully.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

California didn't vote for Trump.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Do you think Iran cares? That girls school didn’t commit heinous crimes against Iranians but got obliterated all the same. The US has show quite clearly that it doesn’t matter, so why should their victims be held to a higher standard? Besides, the targets would be US tech which is a valid target.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

California is among the biggest contributors to USA gdp. They need to sink out economy to sink out country they don't care if the state is red or blue it's all USA to them!

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Because you are one country the rest of the world doesn't care I'd your a blue OE red state you are all Americans. Or are you on my responsible for wars your team starts. Which means all Americans are responsible for the shit storm in the muddle east.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I don't like it and it's not my fault, but as an American it's my responsibility I suppose. Quite unfortunate this country marches to the drum of the loud minority, time we see a regime change here!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

It would make more sense to start with Florida, which is also a big contributor and the Trumpiest state.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No some people in California did. There is in state that didn't vote for Trump. Just 38.3 percent voted for him that is a lot of people.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Of course, but the state as a whole didn't. The people that do vote for him overwhelmingly live in flyover rural areas, but those wouldn't be tempting targets for Iran.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If the Iranian government ever decides to attack on USA soil they're asking to become a wasteland. The country and military I'm most afraid of is of the USA. They will bomb every single government facility in Iran in about 2 weeks and I wouldn't rule out nukes.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

This is what the administration wants. They have been openly laying the groundwork for it as an excuse to seize domestic power militarily. If there is an attack on US soil it is solely the Republican party that bears all blame and responsibility.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

And? Right now it’s basically what’s happening, except it also includes schools and infrastructure and hospitals. You’re saying they should just sit down and take it? The US has this problem with not understanding what a consequence is and it might be time they learned.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They will bomb every single ~~government facility~~ elementary school* in Iran in about 2 weeks

ftfy

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah it would be the stupidest thing they could possibly do. The approval rating of the war is under 20%.

That said, I worry that these "warnings" are a precursor to a false flag attack.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes. I wonder if that's an option on the gambling platforms?

My guess is they hit an Army base, so that they can better control the narrative.

That and just plain old manufacturing consent

[–] choui4@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 days ago (8 children)

There is no possible way this would happen. None. You expect me to believe that an unknown ship would be able to get within a striking distance to americas shores, then a tony ass drone would fly undetected onto the WEST coast of Cali; all so they could blow up one medium sized building? Give me a fucking break.

False flag written all over it

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Boy, do I have news for you about how weakly controlled shipping is. There are so many ships moving around with legit seeming purposes that actually do things they're not supposed to. And sometimes the people who crew and own the ship aren't even from the place the ship is registered!

It's not like they'd be loading satellite visible drones from an Iranian port on an Iranian flagged container ship post attack and then running full steam toward San Diego.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That is what normally happens when you attack someone, they fight back.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Oooh a false flag. One of many we'll see from the Trump administration I'll bet.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"aspired". We all have aspirations. Doesn't mean we're capable of doing them.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Iran is fully capable. They’re not some small spec of a country in the middle of a desert. A war with Iran is a terrible idea, not only thinking of their size but the amount of refugees it could create.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago (13 children)

How is Iran going to get the drones over there?

[–] Death__BySnuSnu@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A swallow carrying a drone?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

European or African swallow, they have different unladen velocities.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I would think Gulf Coast oil refineries would be a better target. You’d further constrain the US gas supply, and bring the war to red states, both of which could erode support for the President and his war.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This just sounds like another excuse for a "preemptive strike". Why would Iran attack a state that is generally opposed to war?

The government lies. We've seen them lie. We've seen so many cases of the CIA lying. Why would I believe the FBI about this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I can’t imagine Trump would care too much what happens in a blue state unless it can turn them MAGA.

load more comments
view more: next ›