this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
229 points (99.6% liked)

politics

28858 readers
2234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Cadet Brain Damage has to go.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 hours ago

A spokesperson for Fetterman added that “whether the senator is on a letter or not, he fully stands behind a comprehensive investigation into this tragedy.”

Bro, what?

[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 7 points 8 hours ago

Going to create a Firefox add-on that automatically replaces the name Fetterman with 'Bag of Dicks Wearing A Hoodie'

Strictly as a quality of life upgrade.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

I fins it funny that there isbalways that one dem. Used to be manchin, and now its fetterman. Almost like its by design.

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 57 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Because he’s a republican sleeper.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He’s got that enlarged amygdala look and vibe for sure.

The left thought he was one of us because he talks shit about Trump and wears a hoodie. The fact that’s all it took should be enough for deep reevaluation of who we’re choosing to represent us.

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 0 points 6 hours ago

Mamdani is the same. People said he was a socialist and he didn’t argue because he wanted votes. Then he raids homeless camps and slashes library funding.

Humans are idiots

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's horribe what brain damage can do to people and their personality.

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

He didn’t change, he was always that way.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well, maybe he's always had some brain damage?

[–] hammertime@lemmy.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, that’s probable.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 24 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

He wasn't a sleeper, this is who he has always been. But since he had that D next to his name Democrats had no problem putting him into office. They overlooked everything just so it would be their team in place

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

It's funny to me. I know an older guy (early 60s) from PA who's a lefty, very liberal. I remember him being so happy when Fetterman got elected. He said he was ecstatic he had a senator he thought he could share a beer with. He's incredibly disappointed in him now. Just today he said how he would gladly vote for Newsom if he's the nominee in '28. We're so cooked.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago

They never learn

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Why does everyone wanna drink with these guys

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 18 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I mean his competition was the fraudulent Dr... Also prior to his stroke he was aligned more as a progressive. Strokes mess up the brain.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

alleged stroke

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is a BS excuse of certain democrats who refuse to admit they screwed up.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Even Bernie was supporting fetterman. If you think "Dr." Oz was better choice I got some fake pills to sell you.

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. Bernie Sanders is not some God. Maybe if the Democratic party actually floated real candidates instead of APAIC troglodytes, people would have voted for someone else.

At any rate, his "brain damage" was not the issue. The issue was that the democrats got conned. And that's really not a big deal to be honest. We all make mistakes. But not owning it is so lame.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say Bernie was a god. He's just one of the best we got. Dudes not a corporate sellout and has stood publicly with his beliefs instead of lying to get votes time and time again.

There should be reprucussions for lying / swapping parties if you don't do what you were voted to do, another vote should be held to fill in that party's representative for the rest of the term.

[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 8 hours ago

With regards to repercussions, I agree. It would be nice if there was a way to recall senators for blatantly lying to the public.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago

He was trash before his stroke

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 6 points 18 hours ago

Follow-up: I found a sample ballot from fetterman's senate election. There wasn't really a stand-out candidate in that race. Richard Weiss seems to be the most moral, but not perfect. I can't fault the voters given their material conditions.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Never trust someone from York County

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 21 hours ago

I'm not very familiar with that election. Who was the best candidate? Richard Weiss?

[–] xerxes@piefed.social 13 points 19 hours ago

Something definitely broken in Fetterman's brain https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/2026748211914813850

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

There's always a Lieberman.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

All it would take is one brave American to put a stop to fetidman.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad to see that the VBNMW crowd that got him elected knew what was best for Pennsylvania instead of listening to people that knew who he was.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah they should have voted for Dr Oz instead

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Same result, and there were 4 or 5 others on the ballot. Keeping yourself locked up with fascists will only give you more fascism