this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
147 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6318 readers
1378 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44340504

Our actions and voices do make a difference! Keep AI out of games and reward original creative work.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 7 points 54 minutes ago

“Won’t someone please think of the poor shareholders!?”

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 49 minutes ago

Investors don't care about games as art, they carr about games as a vehicle for making money.

If they are pushing for AI in games, it's because they think it will make them money, not because they think it will be good for games.

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[–] MagnyusG@lemmy.world 99 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Major investor is 'shocked and sad' they're not seeing returns on AI.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 1 points 51 minutes ago

They are really disappointed in us.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 hours ago

Shocked and sad he is going to be broke.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 35 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd say that's one of the reasons they don't like it! Others include the use of artists' work without consent, environmental issues, the quality of AI output, and the feeling that automating culture production can only result in what is now commonly called "AI slop

Summed it prefectly why people hate AI in culture. AI can be very useful in science, medicine, engineering, and similar professions. When the AI is built upon very specific data set. There is no conscious reasoning behind why the AI did what when it makes art.

Generative AI is just slop. It takes previous works and repackages it what the code says. When people make art, there are hundreds of micro decisions that people make. Those micro decisions are gone when AI makes it. Gabi Belle did a great video of why they hate AI art. https://youtu.be/QtZDkgzjmQI

[–] INeedANewUserName@piefed.social 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

AI is generally only considered useful in professions people aren't actually familiar with. AKA it isn't in its current form to actual experts in anything.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

"Generative AI is great at doing everything I suck at, but it's completely terrible at the things I actually know!"

Too many people think that this and do not seem to understand that it is pretty shitty at everything. Well, except getting people to kill themselves, I guess. It's pretty good at doing that.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 1 points 27 minutes ago

I was watching Ryan hall and his little AI bot the other day. It occasionally goes off the rails.. Weird how he keeps trying though. Sometimes a bit entertaining, but if something I was using was malfunctioning that much I would not consider it a useful tool.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Cue the serial killer telling me that I don't know what I'm talking about and that they could get people to kill themselves so much better and easier.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

The silver lining for the AI companies is that there's a lot of real humans getting real money that are also really shitty at what they are paid to do.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

Coincidentally, Hollywood is pretty good at portraying every profession except the one I know!

[–] imacatnotaman@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 hours ago

Good. They can go have a pity party circle jerk at Satya's house lol

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 18 points 3 hours ago

Good, those dirty fuckers don't deserve accolades or reward for peddling their lies about the capabilities of LLMs (which are limited because these are just tools). It's honestly that creative endeavors like games development is human lead, because LLM garbage is so flat and empty. Humanity might have tricked rocks into carrying out complex calculations and other operations using silicon and electricity...We haven't taught it to think or feel. Human beings with lived experiences should be the only people involved in the creative and technical aspect of games development.

I hope they eventually take the L on peddling LLMs as AI, moving on to normal grifts I can point and laugh at them about. ROFL

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago