this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
387 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

82810 readers
4007 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox’s free VPN will offer 50 gigabytes of monthly data, which is pretty generous for a browser-based VPN. A Mozilla account is required to make use of it, which isn’t a hardship (they’re free), but is a point of friction some may wish to know upfront.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

And how exactly do we know for certain that all that juicy web access data complete linked to whatever identifying information associated with a Mozilla account isn't going to be sold?!

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The same could be said about any VPN out there. Read the ToS and privacy policy, and either believe it or don’t.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

True, but Mozilla being what it had been the past few years I trust them no further than I can throw them

Edit: pay the few dollars for mullvad

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Samme as every other vpn???

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 17 points 10 hours ago

Processed by LLMs no doubt.

I loved Mozilla for years but trust nothing from them these days.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

And an ai watchdog to keep you clean

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So they know it's you all the traffic comes from?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. No thanks. Nothing is ever "free".

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If something is free then you are the product

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

How does that sqaure away with FOSS?

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 50 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Usable addition, and the fact that it is only in-browser is actually a merit in some cases. Firefox gets a lot of hate but is way more privacy centric out of the box compared to Chrome. AI is only opt-in and you can literally customize the entire browser using about:config. Mozilla also maintains the only real competing web engine (not considering Apple's locked in ecosystem) and they are the reason browsers are open source these days.

[–] timroerstroem@feddit.dk 40 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

AI is only opt-in

Not to take anything away from your overall point, which I completely agree with, but this may be a bit of a stretch. All of the "AI" buttons and features are - to my knowledge - on by default. They have made it a lot easier to change that to "off by default now and in the future", which is very welcome, but "only opt-in" is, again, a bit of a stretch.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Well, yes. In so far as they’ve added a new opt in button, and it would be silly to assume every user wants it off now. Instead, users that previously installed get a “turn off AI here” button when the update happens.

I’d say that’s a good trade off.

[–] madsen@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Please stop adding bloat to my browser. I have nothing against VPN, but it's not a fucking core feature of a web browser. Put that stuff in an extension that I can install if I want.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

They should make a "Firefox Core" which contains only the browser with basic features, and then make another version which contains all the "fun" stuff.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

Isn't that what extensions are for? This basically already exists. It's a shame Mozilla doesn't utilize it for this

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Install LibreWolf then disable the cookie clearing and resistFingerprinting.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago

They need to separate gecko properly so we can build things using just the renderer.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on the country you are living in. There are plenty of people with restricted and surveilled internet.

[–] madsen@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but do you think they're going to allow Firefox if it comes with a built-in VPN?

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

How exactly are you going to 'disallow' a piece of software?

Texas and Florida haven't banned it yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 132 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox’s free VPN won’t be using Mullvad’s infra though; it’s hosted on Mozilla servers around the world (if beta testing of the feature done in late 2025 tracks).

...oh.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 1 day ago (23 children)

How long before that data gets sold?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 99 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If anyone missed them removing the "we will never sell your data" from their promise to their users, this is clearly their next step in monetizing their users.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/02/firefox-deletes-promise-to-never-sell-personal-data-asks-users-not-to-panic/

[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

This is exactly my worry. Usually the reason a VPN is free is because they're selling your data on the backend. No thank you.

[–] 3x3@lemy.lol 95 points 1 day ago (6 children)

“Free” as you pay with your data?

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~ No, Mozilla uses Mullvad as a partner, they're a serious and nolog VPN provider.

https://mullvad.net/en/blog/mullvad-vpn-was-subject-to-a-search-warrant-customer-data-not-compromised ~~ EDIT: Didn't read the article, the free VPN won't be using Mullvad apparently.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

For everyone who thinks this is just gonna be a way for them to somehow sell your data, I don't think so.

Think about it like this. You can buy a VPN plan for as little as $2 a month or less depending on the provider if you have a long-term commitment (e.g. 1-2 years). That pricing includes margin.

Firefox can essentially operate at lower prices than that, because they:

  • Don't have to charge themselves an extra margin
  • Have an economy of scale since they're not just one user paying for themselves, they're a company paying for thousands at a time
  • Cap their per-user cost well below what most users actually use. (I used over 300 GB of data in the last 30 days just on my PC, almost all through Firefox, with even more on Firefox on my phone.)

I would bet this would probably cost Mozilla less than a dollar per user per month, and that's also assuming all those users are continuing to use the VPN service over time, maxing out their data limit, but refusing to pay for anything else after.

Meanwhile, Mozilla conveniently sells their own VPN service provided through Mullvad, which they make a profit on.

If a user cares enough to continue using the VPN because they want a VPN, they'll blow through the data limit and be more inclined than the average user to pay for Mozilla's option. (rather than going "I guess I'll only care about my privacy for 5 days out of the month")

If a user doesn't care enough to continue using the VPN because they were just trying it out, but they chose to use Firefox because it had a free VPN bundled in, which sold them on it over another browser, Mozilla just paid less than an ad would cost for a conversion.

And at the end of the day, it also just helps keep up their reputation as a browser that respects your privacy, which makes it easier to promote the browser elsewhere, in ads or otherwise.

This feels more like a marketing ploy that's likely to just save money on ad conversions for new Firefox users, and increase Mozilla VPN conversions, rather than something they're gonna use to super secretly siphon off your data and sell it to advertisers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bagbrugsen@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Firefox ftw. Thanks firefox for making my surfing great.

load more comments
view more: next ›