this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
435 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31167 readers
2410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I propose we call it the Luigi Movement, after Luigi Mario the less famous brother of Mario Mario.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Something with a sharp downward movement. On an unrelated note. I like French furniture.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago

Especially when it comes with a little basket attached for collecting cutoffs

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think a movement is putting it lightly.

It's probably worse than most people see on the surface and in pop culture.

I wonder how many people are killed to protect the game they play. Sure we have the wars... But I mean like quiet murders and accidental deaths. Or people trying to start a movement and then getting manipulated and put in jail or psych....or made to be homeless.

I think Americans are way to privileged and naive to understand the raw reality. We are groomed to NOT understand. We are submissive to a culture created by our masters and don't question it. We know it's real now... So i don't understand how people think they can change it by using the systems specifically made to create the problem.

The game players, regardless of nation, utilize the nations as tools. The nations are like a service. The nations people are the product, bought sold and traded for the benefit of the game playing elite. It's like cattle. We are the cattle and work horse, that nation is the farm owner, and the elite own the farmer.

It's not what we were told. It's not going to be fixed using the methods we were taught can fix it. I mean look where we are today... This is what following their lead got us to. The foundation is too rotted to rebuild on.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago
[–] killea@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Billionaires need to be liquidated.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Liquified *

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like a job for Brunt - FCA

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think he'd just take a bribe tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

There is no need to curb billionaire‘s power if you simply curb billionaires.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 months ago

For decades the Epstein class has been grooming Americans to ridicule the French. Because the last thing they want is for Americans to get inspiration from any historical French solutions.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Send them to fight in Iran. They can stay for as long as it takes for them to pay back their fair share in taxes. Assessed by federal minimum wage, of course.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Minimum wage earners don't pay federal taxes. They might have withholding throughout the year, but they get that back in their refund

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Minimum wage earners don’t pay federal taxes.

They're definitely paying federal tariffs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I'm saying that we should force the billionaires to slave away at minimum wage for thousands of hours to pay back their debt.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I read that as: they can stay in Iran until they pay what they owe. Not, they're earning their way back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

America needs to curb stomp billionaires.

[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The biggest hurdle to starting any sort of revolution or meaningful societal change in the US is finding leadership willing to risk having a target on their backs to rally the masses to action. Anyone willing to be the first to step up will be harassed, pursued, abused, and potentially killed.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of leaders to follow, plenty of groups to join, plenty of events to attend.

This type of information isn't broadcast on the local news. You have to go looking for like-minded people.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

The revolution will not be televised. It'll also not be on social media.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That should be easy in the Land of the Free, Home of the Brave

[–] Azal@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago

Dunno your country, but if you're not from the US, the people that say those jingoistic celebrations of the country are the most right wing of us. I live in a very heavily right wing state and patriotism is laid on so fucking thick because if somehow people were to take off the patriotism glasses they'd figure out they're getting robbed blind.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We need a new social contract that makes accumulating more than a regular lifetime's amount of money unappealing.

We need solutions that are acceptable to all parties even if there are losers. The trick is getting the losers to accept it without coercion.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 12 points 6 months ago

Just THINKING of this is TERRORISM!

-Trump's NSPM-7 Memo!

[–] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Gee, if only we'd tried that before.

Remember the "1%" protests against the billionaire class?

It didn't matter, because every time people contribute to a 401k or go shopping at a chain box store, they add power to the 1%. People say they want to fight the ultra-rich, but they don't really want to fight. Nobody wants to sacrifice their comfort or security. We know from history how this ends...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I guess we should do nothing then because a half-assed initiative failed

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The most practical forms of direct action benefit its participants individually. Classic example is joining a union, which will give you better compensation at their expense.

Unilateral sacrifices just exhaust you and accomplish little. Become a part of the new economy in which you want to live.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You are right that worker unions should have the weight of collective bargaining behind them, enough to affect the big changes. However, the US has demonstrated again and again that it will just crush unions if they start to irritate the ownership class a little too much. Like what Reagan did to air traffic controllers, what Scott Walker did to the Wisconsin public employees union, and the 2022 railway worker labor dispute under Biden.

Unions have been defanged by decades of ownership class lobbying and regulatory capture. The executive branch has no qualms about neutralizing and marginalizing union workers who step too far out of line. Something much bigger than labor unions is needed, but I'm afraid the ownership class has us all so exhausted from overwork and the media too wary of our neighbors for that to happen. For the public to build the kind of movement it needs will take both a hugely impactful economic downturn that affects everyone, and as much as I wish it weren't the case, an immensely charismatic figure to pull them together. Whenever someone with an anti-status quo message and the charisma to start pulling people together starts to gain traction, they invariably end up on the business end of the CIA.

It's hard not to feel defeated and deflated, especially when we're all so exhausted.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 months ago

No billionaires, no billionares' power.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 10 points 6 months ago

Luigi Mario is one of the richest video game characters in existence. His networth after inheriting that haunted mansion is enormous. The gems he finds alone are worth hundreds of millions.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The percentage of sociopaths involved with defining a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

~~through taxation~~

FTFY. ✊🏼

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

euthanised

More like a haircut.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

We need a WAR on greed.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
  • Use p2p social networks (you've already started!) and free and open source software
  • Get to know your neighbors
  • Talk to coworkers about pay, benefits, working conditions, and unions
  • Save as much money as you can outside of the American economy
  • Buy a gun, learn to maintain it, and spend time at the range
  • Participate in peaceful protests but be prepared to be attacked by police
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You missed "run for local office and replace those cronies in charge"

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Fun fact: guillotine is a ohko but only 30% accuracy

[–] huaxie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

One of those moves that only hits if your opponent uses it.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

That can be helped if you make sure the opponent can move. Some sort of restraint.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wish it hadn’t come to that … it ought to be more straightforward to roll back the clock, as MAGAts want to do. Roll back all those tax cuts for the wealthy. Roll back Supreme Court decisions letting them avoid taxes. Roll back letting corporate money dominate politics. Roll back union busting.

Income taxes used to be very progressive, in that wealthy people paid a much higher percentage. However now that ladder stops, the percentage stops rising, and ever more wealth and money accumulation can be defined as “not income”, so the wealthy pay the least in taxes (by percentage).

Rolling back these changes should help narrow the huge gap of income inequality, reduce corporate ownership of our government, and give ordinary people more of a voice

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 2 points 6 months ago

in that wealthy people paid a much higher percentage.

Wealthy people don't have income. Biggest pitfall

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

Movement? Does bolt-action count?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

No... really?

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is Ralph Nader's 2000 campaign. Congratulations on catching up.

https://youtu.be/GNQb06kKysY

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I was at the debate protest where they wouldn't allow him in, even with an actual ticket to the debate. And then SCOTUS signaled the bgenning of the end by appointing new world order Georgie boy.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Rope-a-dope

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

If by movement you mean bullets....you're almost there.

load more comments
view more: next ›