this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
442 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

82886 readers
2264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 43 minutes ago (3 children)

Is there any way I can hide AI on Google? I'm using Vivaldi (which is a Chromium browser).

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 1 points 3 minutes ago

You can hide the AI preview using udm14.com or adding &udm=14 query param to your google queries (can be done automatically by adding browser search engine with this param)

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

You can use the web page, aka udm14. You can also set this in your browser so that typing in the search/address bar directly opens this.

I have no idea if this particular development affects these results, but so far it's been nice. No AI summary, no "similar" advertisement, no "questions about…". Just plain results. Like, I don't know, that old google website.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 32 minutes ago

No.

The only thing you can do is make your search more ambiguous and the results worse. Google shows the AI summary only if it is confident enough.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

Before long they will use it to just create their own sites. Their own articles. Why replace just the headline. A whole internet of just google ai generated bs. Just search something on Google and everything from there on is ai generated. All results. All pictures. The maps. Everything. Nothing will be real.

[–] sinematic@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Absolute pricks. "Don't do evil" they said.

AI has biases. News are titled to be biased too. This is grounds for fake news.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Don't, do evil!

[–] sigmabot@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'd trust an LLM to summarize an article and give it an honest title over a piece of shit journalist that wrote it.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

~~Don't~~ do evil

Hasn't that been Google's guiding principle for quite some time already?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

"Don't be evil" hasn't been an official guiding principle for over a decade, no.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Sloplines.

Breaking Hallucinations!

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. Thats horrible. Google has been a shitty search engine for a while now, but this is even worse.

I quit using them as my main search probably 5 years ago. But I get that most people still use it and most people will be misled.

Awful.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What engines would you advise to someone who is thinking about ditching google?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Not sure are they any better, but I use Ecosia and Qwant. Some prefer also DuckDuckGo.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

Apparently this has been going on for a while but The Verge started sounding the alarm 3 months ago. They know most people won't read more than a couple sentences past a headline if they even open the article at all. Confirmation bias is about to go wild

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 31 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

noai.duckduckgo.com

It offers also news search as well as image and video search. Filtering out AI images. Guaranteed AI summary free.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I may switch to them as my primary provider. They seem to source results from Bing, and with the noai prefix hopefully won't keep turning on AI summary like Ecosia does 😑

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 49 minutes ago

Duckduckgo does not only source from Bing.They use sources from everyone but Google and they have their own web crawlers and an index of their own. Their results feel considerably more relevant to me than whatever Bing is doing. '

Have a look here for more infos: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/news-rankings

In some cases I still feel like Google has an edge but those cases become less frequent.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys are still using Google?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago

I'm as surprised as you are.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I tried looking for an instruction PDF for some stage lights the other day. No amount of "google-fu" could find the right thing. Links labeled as one model showed stuff for other models when clicked, and the god awful summary that it shoves in your face was just full of contradictions of itself. Google is warm trash water at this point.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Try startpage. It's bliiissssss

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 44 minutes ago

It is owned by the ad company System1 though.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago

I find the same thing with vehicle years, I look for say a fuse box layout for a 1985 c20 truck and I will get nothing but genaric trash or stuff for 2021 model years. I used to be able to use "year" but even that has stopped working. Like how do you fuck model and year up?

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I HAVE HAD ENOUGH!!!!!

Goddamn fuckers just won’t stop!!!

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 111 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blah3166@piefed.social 96 points 1 day ago (23 children)
[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I still use Google Scholar, but I have recently seen that it is also being enshitified. What's the next best option?

[–] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] yourgodlucifer@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blah3166@piefed.social 3 points 18 hours ago

Their old version with the 'random' option is the best way to find random, small, niche sites.

https://old-search.marginalia.nu/search?query=browse%3Arandom

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Ecosia seems to be pushing the aI stuff hard as well, but at least you have to press the obnoxious AI buttons to get it. Still, it refuses to make those buttons optional. Duckduckgo let's you have clean experience without rubbing AI buttons or AI summaries in your face and so does qwant.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Still, it refuses to make those buttons optional.

Not only that, back before I left Ecosia a few months ago, it kept forgetting that I turned off AI summaries. Every week or so it would turn back on... I'll try DuckDuckGo's noai prefix this time, that hopefully won't have this issue. (I really like Ecosia's mission, but come on...)

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 54 minutes ago

Duckduckgo should not have any such issues. If you need that prefix you should not even need any cookies. Going there has all those no AI settings on by default. Regarding Ecosia, could it be that you deleted some related cookies accidentialy? Or did they really push in a very sleazy way for AI?

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm sure the trees appreciate the AI sicofancy. /s

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Protip, you can use your hostsfile or your router to block google so you don't get tempted. If you may have to bypass, you can use some blocking extensions to allow an override after a nag screen chastising yourself for being weak willed. I rarely reach for the goog nowadays because I have a whole workflow I go through before giving in.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (13 children)

What the fuck are we supposed to do when the services we use are monopolies which actively seeks to destroy its competition as well as enshittify itself to a point its unusable :|

Time to start self hosting. 

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›