this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
476 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

82886 readers
2375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

What Google is accomplishing with this change is tighter control of their results.

This is disappointing and only serves the interest of Google.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Is there any way I can hide AI on Google? I'm using Vivaldi (which is a Chromium browser).

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

find a searxng instance

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 1 points 1 hour ago

You can hide the AI preview using udm14.com or adding &udm=14 query param to your google queries (can be done automatically by adding browser search engine with this param)

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You can use the web page, aka udm14. You can also set this in your browser so that typing in the search/address bar directly opens this.

I have no idea if this particular development affects these results, but so far it's been nice. No AI summary, no "similar" advertisement, no "questions about…". Just plain results. Like, I don't know, that old google website.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 9 points 4 hours ago

Before long they will use it to just create their own sites. Their own articles. Why replace just the headline. A whole internet of just google ai generated bs. Just search something on Google and everything from there on is ai generated. All results. All pictures. The maps. Everything. Nothing will be real.

[–] sinematic@lemmy.zip 19 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Absolute pricks. "Don't do evil" they said.

AI has biases. News are titled to be biased too. This is grounds for fake news.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Don't, do evil!

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

~~Don't~~ do evil

Hasn't that been Google's guiding principle for quite some time already?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"Don't be evil" hasn't been an official guiding principle for over a decade, no.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

On reddit I would respond with r/woosh

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Ah, I was waking up and didn't see the strike through

Both here and on reddit you can just say "whoosh" although it wouldn't really have totally made sense

[–] sigmabot@lemmy.zip -3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'd trust an LLM to summarize an article and give it an honest title over a piece of shit journalist that wrote it.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Sloplines.

Breaking Hallucinations!

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. Thats horrible. Google has been a shitty search engine for a while now, but this is even worse.

I quit using them as my main search probably 5 years ago. But I get that most people still use it and most people will be misled.

Awful.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

What engines would you advise to someone who is thinking about ditching google?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 minutes ago

I used duckduckgo for a long time, still a good choice. Now i am using that and Kagi.

The nice thing about either is you can use !bangs to search and get to specific sites quickly.

https://duckduckgo.com/bangs

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Not sure are they any better, but I use Ecosia and Qwant. Some prefer also DuckDuckGo.

[–] Fit_Series_573@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

Apparently this has been going on for a while but The Verge started sounding the alarm 3 months ago. They know most people won't read more than a couple sentences past a headline if they even open the article at all. Confirmation bias is about to go wild

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

noai.duckduckgo.com

It offers also news search as well as image and video search. Filtering out AI images. Guaranteed AI summary free.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I may switch to them as my primary provider. They seem to source results from Bing, and with the noai prefix hopefully won't keep turning on AI summary like Ecosia does 😑

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Duckduckgo does not only source from Bing.They use sources from everyone but Google and they have their own web crawlers and an index of their own. Their results feel considerably more relevant to me than whatever Bing is doing. '

Have a look here for more infos: https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/news-rankings

In some cases I still feel like Google has an edge but those cases become less frequent.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys are still using Google?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm as surprised as you are.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's almost as bad as still using Twitter. In 2026.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I tried looking for an instruction PDF for some stage lights the other day. No amount of "google-fu" could find the right thing. Links labeled as one model showed stuff for other models when clicked, and the god awful summary that it shoves in your face was just full of contradictions of itself. Google is warm trash water at this point.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Try startpage. It's bliiissssss

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 0 points 2 hours ago

It is owned by the ad company System1 though.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 20 hours ago

I find the same thing with vehicle years, I look for say a fuse box layout for a 1985 c20 truck and I will get nothing but genaric trash or stuff for 2021 model years. I used to be able to use "year" but even that has stopped working. Like how do you fuck model and year up?

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I HAVE HAD ENOUGH!!!!!

Goddamn fuckers just won’t stop!!!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 1 points 56 minutes ago

I did. Still angers me.

load more comments
view more: next ›