this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
941 points (98.8% liked)

196

4555 readers
2050 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 110 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Makes sense. They traveled a lot. Nowadays we’re all looking out our peepholes so we can ensure that we don’t run into neighbours.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is my favourite scholar on the topic. His lectures are so good. I've seen him speak a few times.

https://aeon.co/essays/the-viking-age-is-undergoing-a-revisionist-transformation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mischk@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No surprise. They where sailors travelling the world.

So are modern Scandinavians. Also I'm not so sure about gen alpha Norwegians. There are a large number of half Thai kids in rural areas. Norwegian women escape the villages to go live in Bergen/Oslo and the men who stayed home to take care of the family farm go over to Thailand to find someone. It's a stereotype but it definitely happens pretty frequently.

Also there's a large foreign population generally (the oil industry and service industry attracts a lot of foreigners and Norway takes a fair number of refugees) æand they're (relatively) well integrated (this doesn't apply to Sweden). You actually see some Muslim women in Norwegian national dress with a headscarf that's embroidered with the same pattern, which is cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nazis didn't even steal viking runes. They completely made them up after some crackpot says he was shown the runes by nordic ghosts in the early 1900s.

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Yes but the neonazis use actual Norse pagan symbolism, which means you can't use Norse themed jewelry without people thinking you're a fascist. 😠

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just add a pride flag and people will think you're a Loki worshipper

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

In Germany, the distinction seems to be that Nazis might get away with homosexuality (e.g. Alice Weidel, one of the AfD party leaders, is a lesbian women), but they don't consider themselves part of the LGBT+ community and thus won't fly the usual pride flags.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An Austrian/German named Guido is hilarious to me

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yet another thing to blame Blavatsky for

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Ah, someone listened to the latest episodes of Behind The Bastards

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Valhalla isn't a reward though, it's a hell for those that don't enjoy battle. Here's what happens in Valhalla:

  • You equip your armor and weapons
  • You walk out into the courtyard
  • You kill eachother
  • You are resurrected
  • You go to dinner
  • You equip your armor and weapons
  • You walk out into the courtyard
  • You kill eachother

etc. etc.

It is NOT a reward. Valhalla is not heaven, it is a place that Odin puts his very specific chosen warriors that died a violent death in battle. Whether you go to Valhalla doesn't depend on you being either a good or bad person, only how you died. Odin himself will even actively intervene and make sure you lose your fight and die in battle, just because he wants you as one of his Einherjar.

Valhalla being portrayed as this big reward for good people is a bastardised version brought in by Christians.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you like to know more?

☑️ yes

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

OP didn’t include this, but the whole point of Valhalla is that it’s a training facility for Ragnarok. Odin is gathering the fiercest warriors to fight at the end of the world.

Also, it’s possible (likely?) that Norse warriors actually really wanted to go to Valhalla. Their values system was different to ours, and a place where you get to fight (gain honor) and feast with your friends every day probably sounded pretty good to them.

Thanks! TIL Valhalla was a place of death and feasting waiting to fight and die again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Valhalla is not a punishment though, as only real warriors (read: most likely this will be people who love battle) will be granted access.

Therefore, Valhalla is a reward yes. Just not for "being a good person", but Odin still decided who the real warriors were.

No Nazis would be considered real warriors. They are cowards by nature.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

i like the "no Nazis in Valhalla" phrase because Valhalla is an idea, not a real thing. but let's not pretend vikings were good people just to spite Nazis. you're just doing the same mythologizing.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference here is that nazis are a political movement, vikings were an actual whole ass culture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were people. There were good ones and bad ones. Some might help with the laundry, some might blow a gasket for being reminded to clean up after dinner, some would be cried over and missed because they went out to sea and never came home. Generalising any culture or group in one direction or the other isn't encouraging informed discussion. Nazis, however, are unequivocally bad, 'mkay?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nooooo you’re ruining my pseudohistorical narrative!!!! REEEEE SOMBODY GET ME MY AMPHETAMINES

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Shoutout to this absolute banger

[–] josefo@leminal.space 12 points 1 week ago

oh god I'm really laughing out loud, not just air coming out of my nose

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Leaving that italian cartoon villain speechless like that was a fucking feat

Hey don't knock amphetamines! They're quite pleasant.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As someone who has a lot of Nordic tattoos it sucks that I'm lumped in with these Nazi fucks at a glance.

I'm an atheistic pagan and I fucking hate Nazis or really just bigots in general but I get treated like one by most people.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I got into all the nordic stuff 30 years ago when being a nazi wasn't socially acceptable. So sad to all of them being out and coopting our cool aesthetics

[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

A potential solution is to mix in with some very obviously anti-nazi tats. You can either go directly for anti-nazi, or just heavily indicated by virtue of anti-nazi tattoos (e.g. something obviously pro-lgbt would help dissuade assumptions of Nazi affiliation.)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 1 week ago (10 children)

It's not just the right that engages in blatant revisionist history of Vikings.

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, a lot of people seem to forget what raiding and pillaging involves, especially during that time. I hate when people try to romanticize that crap. It's like if 1000 years from now someone tried to romanticize Nazis or Russian soldiers.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even just regular war was awful before industrialization. Marching armies basically depleted every place they went through of resources, because for a long time there was just no other way to operate. And that means that the people whose food was just taken might starve in the near future.

And that's if the army was nice, rape and pillaging of money and any valuable goods was also very common, even when the army was still marching within the area it was supposed to protect from invasion.

War isn't nice nowadays, either, but it's at least possible to arrive at a war theater without destroying every place on the way, too.

[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

It’s like if 1000 years from now someone tried to romanticize Nazis or Russian soldiers.

And they will. It's such a bummer knowing they'll turn into some trope-y aggressive dorks or something.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

FYI might be worth putting up a NSFW spoiler tag. That said, historically accurate meme woohoo!

Seiðr, feminine one included, was practised by Odin, and vǫlvas, which were almost always women, had enormous respect. Priesthood was primarily a female affair, but I wouldn't be surprised if mingling occurred.

A myth is that "effeminacy" in those cultures is frowned upon; instead, it is a lack of courage, to be yourself, that the earlier Germanic cultures derided heavily.

And so, Thor dressing as a gal, and Loki transforming into one, is actually super brave. The sages describe it more humorously, even, rather than insultingly.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Loke also transformed into a mare, had sex with a stallion and gave birth to Sleipner. (I use my native Norwegian names on the stuff from Norse mythology)

From wiki: "However, Loki had "such dealings" with Svaðilfari that "somewhat later" Loki gave birth to a grey foal with eight legs; the horse Sleipnir, "the best horse among gods and men."

[–] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

This meme format really is just playing dolly

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't Iran derived from aryan? Why aren't these nazi want-to bes wearing kolah namadi?

[–] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Aryan meant Indo-European until the mustache man co-opted the term to mean blonde hair and blue eyes.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Shit, I thought we were the best at cultural reappropriation. How did this get through? (And they like butt stuff.)

load more comments
view more: next ›