this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
625 points (98.6% liked)

politics

31129 readers
2612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One more step toward authoritarian wet dreams.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is this Antifa in the room with us now?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, I don't like fascists. Does that count?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 11 months ago (6 children)

As an Uruguayan this gives me a weird feeling. The dictatorship regime here started cause "the need to quash communist terrorists" called MLN or Tupamaros at the time they where revolutionaries at the time but they served more as an excuse, even the Che Guevara warned them at the time. The military repression and overthrow techniques where learnt in the school of americas that now goes by a different name. And you can see how the parallelism happens in the whole region. The scene is very alike and one would dare to think shit gonna be sadly worse on such an influential country. If anything in time you'll learn the meaning of the phrase

Nunca más...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You would think a country that is really good at terrorising the world would be better to recognise terrorists.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My grandfather was an antifa. Sadly, he isn't around to show this administration how they did it last time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Understood. I will not oppose Fa. I still, however, oppose Fascism.

We need to stop instantly panicking over "Donald Trump declares ..." headlines. He can declare that pigeons are spies sent by Martian aliens. He has no qualifications to say so, nobody intelligent should be paying attention, his zealots will still follow his orders, and it doesn't matter.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 11 points 11 months ago

Him getting the normalcy of calling opponents terrorists is still a reason to panick regardless of him being a moron who declares stupid shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

About as useful as the War on Drugs, or Anon. There's no leader, or organizational structure, but they'll find someone to pin it on. I imagine there's already a board with strings of people they hate ready to go.

[–] jaredt@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If Antifa even was a terror organization in the US it would be one of the most ineffectual ones in existence given the state of the US.

What a fucking joke.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago

We all know the Trump regime is the real domestic terrorist organization. Go give more dark money to superpacs that will make the world better.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Proud Boys? Nah bro, they homies! – also trump regime

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Says the extremist domestic terrorist organization currently occupying my country.

Edit: yes where ARE the Epstein files?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"so are you a 'explode something' terrorist, or 'Shares a meme that hurt someone's fefe's' terrorist?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 12 points 11 months ago
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 12 points 11 months ago

armed standoffs with law enforcement

The Bundy clan and Republic of Texas are antifa?

[–] JubJubBird@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

OK so is he even allowed to do that? And if he isn't are government agencys required to comply with his order until it is overturned?

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No and no. But that's only in the legal/technical sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Oh boy I sure hope that this is what helps the economy, lowers the price of groceries, gas, and housing. So much winning everywhere!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, they're going to raid aintifa's home address!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok serious question and this is by no means an equivalency, but did the Biden admin classify the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers as terrorist organizations? I can’t remember.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No, the list is pretty short. They fucking should be though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›