this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
96 points (82.0% liked)

Memes

15268 readers
1192 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 minutes ago

systemdeez nuts

I guess we’re going to find out how resilient the FOSS movement really is in the face of authoritarianism.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Goddamn people are so reactionary

[–] Lauchmelder@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

these memes all come from the same person

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 42 minutes ago

To be fair this one person is responsible for about 30% of the content on Lemmy. 🤣

[–] xylol@leminal.space 4 points 6 hours ago

I feel like this is one of those times where I tell my engineer to create a procedure for some random dumb thing management wants to implement so that we do it ahead of time before they come in and tell us how to do it

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't hate systemd, but age ID verification? Risks to my privacy grossly outweigh any benefit.

[–] somehacker@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely. That’s not what happened though. It’s a birthdate field with no verification. The point is to show how stupid the laws are.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Don't hate systemd for age verification

Hate systemd for its monolithic, anti-Unix design pattern

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

Ok. Here's the thing. I don't know how linux works. I don't know what systemd is. All I know is that all around the world we got clowns who know less about linux than I do trying to dictate the entire worldwide internet to cater to their specific geographical location, regardless of where the user is.

Then I hear systemd is openly trying to bow at the knee before these laws are even in effect.

And yes, the current system is you as a user inputting your birthday with zero verification.

But the gov of california has already said that before these laws go into effect they'll be looking for stricter laws with checks in place. These systems are not in place now. Nor do they even know what they will turn out to be.

When asked about this, the gov said "We're working on it."

Then systemd comes along, ready to bend all of linux to their whims. So I put two and two together and decided this whole thing is pissing me off.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Systemd isn't monolithic, it's a pluggable framework with a shit load of components

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 5 points 6 hours ago

ok so tell me why I'm waiting for networking to come up before I'm allowed to interact with my computer

Also, its monolithic as heck, its a giant squid into my networking, time management, access control..

Ontop of that.. binary logs ew.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 5 points 6 hours ago

its attestation, not verification, and they are just putting things in place to comply with the law bc you have to. being open source does not exempt you from following the law.

also, since every proprietary platform won't even bat an eye over this everything will soon require it to function (obviously assuming the laws pass). this means linux won't work properly with any web-based things. this is the same issue you get whenever Wayland tries to go against what every other platform does and just breaks a bunch of apps.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Back in the 1980s the idea of being gay was NOT something that was openly accepted in America. You could be attacked, or worse, if the right crowd decided you needed to pay for your lifestyle.

Around this same time, Reagan had completely changed how prisons were funded. Before, it mostly came out of the pockets of the government. And after Reagan, we got what we have now. Prisons for profit.

Which meant conditions went way down, almost overnight, and prison populations started to boom. Because before, prisoners were a burden on tax dollars. If you arrested someone for jaywalking, you now had to convince a judge why a jaywalker belonged in prison.

But now, with megacorporations footing the bill, the expansions of the prison systems could explode. If you paid for prisons to be built and you made profit on each prisoner, you wanted them full.

Which meant.....THE WAR ON DRUGS!

So, now you have massive populations of prisoners, all being held for crimes that shouldn't carry a long sentence, and in many cases, never even happened.

What this meant is, these prisons became almost a community among the prisoners. And as such, you inevitably had gay prisoners.

So to signal to the other prisoners that you were gay, and wanted to get fucked in the ass, you'd wear your pants a little loose, and a little low. The look became known as "sagging". And for about 10 years, nobody outside of prisons knew about it.

Then the 90s came, and these prisoners started getting released. And they continued sagging outside of prison, even though it no longer carried the same weight. It just became a fashion sense among urban communities without a trace of its former meaning.

So when I see this picture.....it's like.....TOO on the nose. Thats not pants sagging, that's pants dropping. The ironic thing is, if you told him that look signaled him as the bitch of the group, he'd probably be very angry. Especially since in the 90s being gay STILL wasn't socially acceptable.

[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you have a source on sagging pants as a gay signal?
Cause from what I read, it was simply prisons offering only one size of pants and not allowing belts.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's fascinating to me how social norms can be so radically warped from one society to another. From my "normal" of not wanting others to see what's under my pants, to this, to having a huge disk pierced into your bottom lip like those African tribes... There's just so much diversity among us. It's pretty cool. And sometimes weird. 😆

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In this case they just wanna show off their expensive brand underwear, though I'm not sure how anyone can walk like that

[–] seathru@quokk.au 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

By showing everything BUT the waistband? The one part that actually displays the branding.

Fair enough, idk why they don't show it here, but it's definitely a thing in the hood

[–] org@lemmy.org 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You don’t wear ankle pants?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I do, I do, it's just... My pants to down to my ankles rather than my ankles going up to my "waist". 😆

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I wear them over my regular pants.

[–] org@lemmy.org 1 points 4 hours ago