this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
430 points (99.5% liked)

Flippanarchy

2220 readers
1189 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's unbelievable how much more powerful, livable, and culturally cohesive you could be as a country, if you had a government that wanted to actually solve systematic problems to make life better for all Americans. Imagine an alternate reality where the US gov actually worked to provide you with the essentials you need to survive? The US could've become objectively, the strongest cornerstone of western democracy, cemented in a history of moral altruism.

This website visualises the ultra wealthy to scale, with examples of issues that could've been solved using this money, such as:

  • ** Chemotherapy for Every Cancer Patient**: The site states that the annual cost of chemotherapy for all cancer patients is approximately $9 billion. It then points out that Jeff Bezos made that much money in just 40 days in 2018.
  • Malaria Eradication: It highlights that a tiny fraction of the wealth of the 400 richest Americans could eradicate malaria globally.
  • Ending Homelessness: The visualization includes the cost to house every homeless veteran in the United States.
  • **Clean Water: **It estimates the cost of providing clean water and waste disposal to every human on earth.
  • Testing for COVID-19: During the pandemic, the site was updated to show that **Bezos's wealth could easily pay to test every single person in the U.S. for the virus. ** and the US would still easily be the richest country in the world. This is without even taking into account the sheer amount of wealth the US and it's politicians possess as a whole country.

So in short, if the US gov actually wanted to help support their own population the US could have: **- Eradicated homelessness, malaria, chemotherapy costs, water scarcity + waste colonialism, and COVID-19 test costs.

  • Provided universal free chemotherapy to every single cancer patient in the US
  • The best and most affordable healthcare system in the world
  • The best education system
  • The most affordable housing system
  • The best Transport
  • Solved** and you'd still have more than enough money to invest in your military, intelligence agencies, and crucial architecture that big business relies on.

Yes that means that every single problem that Americans suffer with, is optional. The only reason Americans don't have all these things, is because the wealthiest people in the world have decided that instead of working in symbiosis with the rest of humanity, they would rather feed off of and suppress the 99%.

The top 1% wants ownership over the whole planet. It isn't enough to live obscenely luxurious lives, they want **total control **over peoples **values, beliefs, actions, and decisions.**They want to own you, they want to own me, and they want to own everyone else. To them we're the equivalent of house squatters living off THEIR real-estate.

So how exactly do they solve that problem? They can't exactly go and evict 9 billion people without serious repercussions. Yet BlackRock bought Christmas Island and has invested so much in housing. and along with billionaires like Zuckerberg, Musk, and Bezos,even bought their own islands. So what do they do if they can't evict us? They do the next best thing; destroy our autonomy, forcing us to rely entirely on them, through legal retribution. How? By criminalising ownership, and forcing everyone to **pay subscription fees for everything. **

First it was music and podcasts. Then movies and TV shows, digital and audio books, as well as social media. So what's left? Well, the only thing not on that list are the essentials, and they're already coming for those too. Think housing, water, food, cars (eventually public transport). If you thought communism, is bad, oligarchy is much worse, just look at Russia.

If you're someone that thinks this will never happen to us, think again. Musk is already looking at implementing paid subscriptions to unlock features in Tesla cars

We can fight back. We can stop things from getting worse, and we can undo the damage that's been done. But only if we can overcome the social divisions they are purposely funding in order to keep everyone from organising against them. We have to become active participants in our communities, if we want to ever live in a truly free world. That might look like something as small as spending time with your family and friends, or helping volunteer with clean up in your council. Whatever you do it is clear, the only way for humanity to survive the commercialized corporate hellscape Earth is becoming, is by coming together in spite of our differences, to fight for something bigger than all of us individually; a world whose freedoms are no longer held hostage by the top 1%.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

This. We need to get out of the weeds and get back on track. We'd need a bit of guidance though as we've become accustomed to our own isolation due to current lack of community. C'mon you extroverts with heart and soul, come back and lead the rest of us out of this cave and we'll do the rest. If you relate any of this to money then we're all screwed.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

If they spend money on something it's because they expect it will give them a greater return.

If they refuse to spend money on something it's because they expect it will not give them a greater return.

If you are wondering what return they get from war, I suggest you consider maintaining elite status as part of it, i.e. "have to postpone midterm elections due to the war" etc.

Scream further into the void. Just stop serving them, ffs.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Cruelty is the Point

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Vote in a right wing government get right wing policy. Pretty simple

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 1 day ago

So where’s the left wing government to vote, because it sure as fuck ain’t the two capitalist parties?

[–] kek@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As if voting would change things in the US

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok youre one of the people voting for right wing policy then.

[–] kek@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You’re saying none of those things would happen under dems?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do we really still need to have this discussion in 2026? I'm happy to go through it as many times as it takes to prevent Americans from voting Trump in a 3rd time.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

people who didn't vote for Trump aren't responsible for his election. the people who did vote for Trump are the only ones to blame for his election.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 day ago

If you're eligible to vote and you voted for trumo, voted 3rd parry or abstained you're responsible. You were happy with either outcome. So you're morally scum like maga.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It would be less worse under the Dems, yeah

- not a USA American

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let me guess, you voted for whoever that third party lady was.

Hm wonder where she's run off to.

Jillian! Where are you?!

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

unless you're voting for a leftist you are definitely voting in a right wing party, Democrat or Republican.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 13 hours ago

So unless you have your perfect candidate you are fine hurting people and making conditions worse for hundreds of millions of people? What a privileged little ivory tower you sit in.

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Talking about the problems without also talking about the solution just angers people who don’t know how to fix things, which is not productive.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We all know what the solution is. But talking about it gets you banned and/or comments removed.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No one here will ban you for talking about overthrowing capitalism and overthrowing the state?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends on whether your comment involves threats of violence or not. Threats of violence are almost always met with a comment removed at minimum.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here?

@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com we can say we should kill the US politicians in a revolution, right?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I ain't your dad. However I do find such statements counter productive as it just scares people away from what anarchism is really about.

As for politicians, I'd rather make them equal to the rest of us. For those who've spent all their lives pampered in privilege that would feel intolerable. Of course the fash can get bashed

[–] 01011@monero.town 1 points 1 day ago

There is no peaceful way to overthrow capitalism.

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

talking about it gets you banned

What about posting an image of a green hat?

[–] org@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago

So find the mods and change their minds. Or, start a lemmy community with less moderation.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leftists: posts agitprop meme

Liberals: "you can't just be angry, you need solutions!"

Leftists: posts meme with appropriate historical context and potential solutions

Liberals: "you leftists always talk too much, give me a tl;dr"

[–] org@lemmy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not what is happening. You’re a good example of what I’m talking about though. Thanks for that.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm illustrating the pattern you liberals always use in response to our memes. The through line is that we never do it the "right" way. You came to an anarchist space to criticize our agitprop, and then get confused when we don't play your game. Why do we need a dissertation to go along with our agitprop?

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m an anarchist. Sorry hon. Not gonna win.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't believe you, but whatever. Since when has agitprop required a dissertation?

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Refusing to have conversations helps nothing.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, so why did you chastise OP instead of starting the conversation?

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I commented on the meme, not the user. And the conversation was about how these memes are missing the solution part.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

these memes are missing the solution

That's not the point of agitprop. It never has been, and never will be.

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just angers people who don’t know how to fix things

You.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you trolling, or do you have a point?

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've consistently said my point. Agitprop does not communicate solutions. It never has, and never will. The IWW did a lot of agitprop. Mr. Block comes to mind, as an example. They communicated grievances and got people upset at the current system. Education comes after the agitprop. This is like organizing 101 stuff.

[–] org@lemmy.org -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see no actions coming from this. Nothing is changing. Failed experiment. Solutions need to be added, new memes need to be generated.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fine, if that's how you feel then do it yourself instead of complaining.

[–] org@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

I’m allowed to complain. They like it when we fight with each other.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If people aren’t sufficiently angry at the system, they won’t bother to listen to a solution.

Gotta raise the discontent and class consciousness first.

[–] org@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

It’s raised as far as it’s going to get. The system will have to get worse, but there won’t be the “until it gets better” part. It’s just going to keep getting worse until it’s so far gone no one can fix it.