this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
440 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29576 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 315 points 1 month ago (4 children)

He is objectively one of the people who has failed this moment.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 127 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least he's calling for himself to be replaced.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Me out now! Me out now! Me out now!

He's either kicking himself out of office, or demanding his own sexual liberation.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can only imagine the thought in his head is:

If I say this first, and loudest, it therefore cannot apply to me, because I called it out.

Fucking terminal shitlib brain; everything is optics, history and context don't exist beyond when I want to A/B test some rhetoric.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The worst part is, it’ll probably work

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good. If Cory Booker sees the way the winds are blowing and wants to start pushing in that direction, good.

You can tell Fox News is scared because when I googled his name, I got

Top stories - Fox News- Cory Booker confronted with old clip of himself saying he loves Donald Trump

(The context is that he's religious and loves all people, including his enemies, but of course they leave that out.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExFed@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

For those of us who are legit unaware ... what did he do (or didn't do) to get put on the shit list?

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

He confirmed a handful of Trumps appointees (one is a relative of Jared Kushner IIRC). He also hasn’t really done anything to stop all this outside his 27 hour filibuster , which didn’t actually filibuster anything.

I’m not as angry as others are about Bookers statement here but he still hasn’t done much to stop anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 188 points 1 month ago (2 children)

....Does he realize he's talking about himself?

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 month ago

Definitely not.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 month ago

Me may still think his pointless filibuster will earn him leadership

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 130 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Objectively fucking hilarious.

This man has been responsible for stomping down the voices who seek to replace him. AOC, Mamdani, Ossof, Platner...keep naming them.

He is no different than Schumer. Fuck both of you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, we all agree, he needs to be replaced or taken out of the leadership position. We will not forget that he and schumer voted to end the shut down we were winning for no reason that I can see.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're talking about Jeffries, not Booker.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well fuck, that's embarrassing. I thought they were the same guy until I just compared a video of Jeffrie and Booker. I guess I put them in the same category of shitty.

https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/14/14262732/cory-booker-senate-democrats

To be clear, these guys don't need to be perfect, but they clearly are looking out for their own interests.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Motherfucker filibustered for over 24 hours, fasted in preparation to do so, only to undo every fucking word he spewed by voting in Trump's nominees.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It wasn't a filibuster. No legislation was being held up. He just gave a long speech as a performance piece. People keep trying to say he had the longest filibuster, but it literally wasn't one.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He’s the 2nd most pathetic out of all the Dems besides Schumer. This dude only cares for appearing to do anything, but never actually does anything because he’s a bought centrist.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Damn, that was a good catch. I had misremembered it as well.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

You're right, Cory. So drop out of your fucking primary and endorse a real leader.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

He also said that “purity tests” within the party have led to more division in the US.

What he's saying is he wants more Conservatives in the Democratic party.

F this guy and his failure of Democratic leadership.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He is definitely against litmus tests regarding AIPAC.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Yup. He needs to sit down.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago

Schumer's preference for centrist candidates

That is code for zionist first candidates. His extreme loyalty to Israel is disqualifying.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 30 points 1 month ago

this left-right divide is killing our country

So you want the nazi-simp vote. Got it.

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"'I’ve called for a generational renewal, because this left-right divide is killing our country and our adversaries know it.' He also said that 'purity tests' within the party have led to more division in the US."

yeah this is kind of the opposite issue of what anyone competent would want to address with chuck schumer

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its also just complete horseshit.

Anybody remeber how David Hogg was actually trying to do this, 9 months ago, earlier than that?

And... basically 0 large parts of the Dem fundraising apparatus got involved in any way?

And... because Hogg tried to do this... he got ousted from his position in the party?

https://www.aol.com/david-hogg-pledged-unleash-20m-193729589.html?guccounter=1

You uh, you coulda said something at that point, Cory.

Flamethrowers for the ratfuckers, thats how they clean em up in the sewers of NYC, I hear.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 17 points 1 month ago

These democrats think the problem is aversion to genocide and not blindly supporting the party. They would rather compromise with the Nazis, than challenge them from a leftist perspective:

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then looks directly in the mirror unironocally

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 1 month ago

He's not the worst, but he's definitely part of the problem. When he calls for new leadership, he really means give it to him, and he wouldn't be much better than Schmuckie Boy. He'd be just as Zionist, that's for sure.

If Booker becomes president, MAGA will be back in power 4 years later.

[–] MrSelfDestruct25@fedinsfw.app 19 points 1 month ago
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Absolutely true.

But Booker ain't that leader.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

Starting with himself, right? Pompous asshole.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“Americans want a new generation of leaders that show that they can lift the whole country up,” Booker added. “It is time for a new vision of our country that is far more uniting that brings people together, doesn’t deepen divides.”

And I want to see the Epstein class in a supermax prison. You know, let them see the kind of prison system they advocate for first hand.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is peak, “we need to move forward and not dwell on the past” chud rhetoric. What America needs is accountability and hostility to the right.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

He desperately wants to be the Obama redux who shows he's the bigger man by just forgiving all the crimes of his opponents. He dreams of an America where a black Muslim immigrant can share a Pepsi with the tatted up ICE agent in army surplus sent to deport his family.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

If you smelt it you dealt it. Get out and make room for someone who actually gives a fuck

[–] MrsVeggies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Just another example of Democrats acting like they oppose themselves in order to crush thier opposition.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Senator Andy Kim countered accusations that the Democratic party is divided, saying “this is the most united I’ve ever seen the Senate Democrats,”

That's not a counter. Just because this is the most united he's seen the Democratic party does not mean that it is united. Divided is the natural state of Democrats. It the words of Will Rogers, “I’m not a member of any organized political party…. I’m a Democrat.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you first you poor excuse for a lukewarm wet towel.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

David Hogg was working towards exactly that until the DNC ousted him. God forbid politicians do any fucking work.

[–] CelestialBunny@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 weeks ago

Complaining about purity tests is often a dog whistle to say that the rights of minorities and women are expendable.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Yes the Dems need to be near completely replaced including this moron. Anyone not bare minimum left of center (and that starts at being against capitalism) needs to go.

load more comments
view more: next ›