this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
760 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

11607 readers
1934 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beacon@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't get the reverence for copies of mass produced objects. I love music too but i don't care if someone uses a marker to write their name on a vinyl jacket. (As long as it's not a rare copy)

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Absolutely. These books go to the Goodwill outlets where they are sold at 25 cents a book, and whatever doesn’t sell goes to a landfill or a recycling plant. Even a bunch of rarer books end up there, which is obviously not great, but it happens.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The idea that Books Are Sacred Objects is an old middle-class belief, one cherished by those to whom the availability of books was still new and potentially precarious. Anyone with any connection with the book trade, meanwhile, knows that mass-produced books are one step above toilet paper, if that: they’re created and destroyed in vast quantities, and every work of cherishable literature is dwarfed by tones of ghostwritten celebrity memoirs, airport thrillers, executive self-help books, partisan political tracts whose physical form exists only to fraudulently goose the charts (the number of partisans who’d exhibit it unread as a totem of allegiance is orders of magnitude smaller than the print run), cash-ins on the latest fad, and merely mediocre writing that fits into a marketable genre. And with LLMs, this is probably worse, with guides to cooking/crafts/software consisting of machine-regurgitated pulp of Reddit posts ascribed to a Plausible White Lady Name complete with plausible bio and headshot. So, no, books as physical objects are not intrinsically sacred.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly. A mass produced book is just an inexpensive mass produced object just like any other. If a particular copy of a book means something special to you then for sure you should take joy in holding onto it and treating it as a unique token that represents the wonderful ideas it imparted into your mind! But that doesn't mean all physical books are special objects.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

No need for reverence. This goes way beyond basic defacement.

Individual pages are bound separately or in small bunches, whereas the cover is a single piece of tougher material. Cutting it directly exposes the pages to far worse wear and tear, and pages will definitely fall out sooner rather than later.

The closer equivalent would be storing the vinyl loose and stacked on each other: far worse wear and tear on the actual product.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

wtf

Like some psycho hobo

[–] Winter_Oven@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

you know, I used to do this for my textbooks for a period of time, because they were huge, and I had to carry the relevant textbooks to school every day.

So that my back doesn't break, and they I don't ruin my bag and the books themselves, I used to split the books according to my semesters, glue some used cardboard as a cover, and cover it whole thing in book wrapping paper.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

The vast majority of books made in something like the last 50+ years are all very low quality and degrade rapidly anyway.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I shred my books to save time reading

[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The LitBros will hunt this man for sport because of what he did to Infinite Jest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 2 months ago

This is practically feasible, as books are made of a number of booklets called signatures, which are stitched or glued together at the spine. Until books became a mass-market item for middle-class consumption, they weren’t pre-bound: you (and by you, I mean a member of the gentry or aristocracy or an educational institution) would buy them as a set of signatures and employ a bookbinder to bind them together. If the book was thick, you could get it bound into several volumes for convenience.

Having said that, if you were doing this for practical reasons, rather than to troll, you’d rebind the books into new bindings (at least using a manila folder or something) so they’d survive until you’ve finished reading them.

[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Feels like a quite awful thing to do 😅

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I shred the binding side with a saw, so I can scan the book with my Fujitsu scanner. Easy way to digitalize a entire book.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 2 months ago

You could just go to IRCHighway, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drath@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Looking at this awakened the memories of back pain from lugging all those fucking textbooks around when I was in school. God, why were they not split into a dozen parts like this? Do kids still carry them these days?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was an only child, but i can see this being invented when a parent or teacher figured out a way for 2 kids to read the same book at the same time, given one has a half book head start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

If you cut Infinite Jest in half, and half of infinity is infinity, is it now two Infinite Jests? Should every page in Infinite Jest be page ∞ since they're all a division of infinity?

I don't know smart math things so I'm just bs'ing here, please don't tell me how wrong I am.

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

They do this for you in Korea. A lot of long novels are released chopped up into ~200 page chunks.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

Get the pitchforks!

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I've done this for coloring books before, but only to make the sheets more accessible. I have never once complained about the transportation issues of a book. Git gud scrub

[–] KarlHungus42@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Insanity. Also doesn't work with IJ unless you ignore the end notes.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

Just read books on your phone, or a tablet. You can carry an entire library with you.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Time to learn DIY book binding...

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nahhhh, get an ebook or borrow from a library. And perhaps find some lighter reading for on the go. You do you, though.

[–] VampirePenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I'd never do this, but paperbacks are pretty much disposable. If you keep any for more than a decade they will do this to themselves.

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Oh shit, I left the half with the end notes at home!

[–] webp@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

They are a magician. They make two books out of a single book. (At least they didn't cut it hamburger style 🫠)

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

My grandfather used to do this but for every chapter because his wrists were too weak to hold on to a full sized book for too long.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

As a book lover I am aghast. But in terms of pure utility, I love it.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I know a woman that cut her textbooks in college to make them less heavy to carry. She is unique.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›