this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
568 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

9764 readers
1603 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Demanding Epstein files would be a sure shot way to get bombed.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

why would they want the US regime to change? It's a poor long term strategy, you want the useless idiots to ruin their country, not have them replaced by competent people.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think they would prefer people who weren't bombing their country with Israel.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think they would prefer people who weren’t bombing their country with Israel.

Have you read history? Authoritarian places need external enemies to rally people behind so that the population will ignore whatever bullshit they do to exploit and abuse them. The only rule is "don't be the one to lose". As long as the theocracy does not surrender, they are winning.

See also : The US after 9/11. We're STILL dealing with the fucking bullshit fallout from that.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Dude, they're continuing to kill school children. 911 was a one off that made everyone scared. Scared, yes. Bombing the shit out of your citizens, no.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well to not get bombed, naturally. The uselessness of said idiots does not have an impact on the fact that the bombs are actively landing on Iran

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 5 hours ago

The only rule is "don't be the one to lose". As long as the theocracy does not surrender, they are winning.

It's entirely reasonable to believe that it is more likely that a new administration would take the chance to end the war than the current one is to make America incapable of bombing Iran on a reasonable timeline

Of course, that assumes that Iran thinks that this would work at all. They might make the full release of the files a condition to open the strait, but America would then just say "well we already released them so that won't work as a deal" and rely on the current administrations cultish supporters to believe that

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” - Napoleon Bonaparte

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 70 points 10 hours ago (43 children)

They can just hold the world’s supply of oil, ammonia and helium to ransom. Breaking an Iranian blockade by force would require a WW2-scale effort, with the US, Europe, China and the gulf states fighting alongside each other to take Tehran and impose some kind of regime change all parties find acceptable.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

China and Russia would be fighting against the EU and US in that hypothetical wwiii scenario

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Isnt china and Iran allies and already have agreements for discounted oil trades?

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unless Dickhead drops a nuke and threatens more. Which I wouldn't put past him.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 points 43 minutes ago

Says who? Definitely not Iran or any international organisation, and even Netanyahu only claims they are two weeks away for the last 20 years.

They probably could make dirty bombs with the enriched Uranium they have, but unless they are playing the world's best feint, they aren't going to have a working nuke any time soon.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 1 points 49 minutes ago

Still wouldn’t put it past him unfortunately

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck that, trade it for Trump dead or alive

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

or alive

No no, let's keep it simple.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

The issue with this is that Iran wants to strait open eventually, its a huge financial gain.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 hours ago

They already released most of the victims names, they can't really pretend they care about them anymore.

load more comments
view more: next ›