I mean, I find it interesting that this pattern does not exist among women.
Too bad the article doesn't actually link the study.
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
658 points (96.7% liked)
politics
29498 readers
4952 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EDIT: Oops, originally just linked to a figure from the document, heh.
I'm bucking the trend
Options: More conservative or lower IQ
Implication: Option #2
Secondary analysis: Good person
Interaction behavior: Amicable, but simple
Thanks, youre pretty swell yourself :).
I like to say that I am smart enough to know im not :D, but, at least I like progressive policies.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Meanwhile, me:
*holding triangle block piece
...and you know what hole that goes in? That's right, the square hole.
load more comments
(4 replies)
As a high IQ person I would like to remind everyone that IQ has been coopted by a scientific racism and eugenics agenda, and the originator, a French man by the name of Alfred Binet,
"stressed that intellectual development progressed at variable rates and could be influenced by the environment; therefore, intelligence was not based solely on genetics, was malleable rather than fixed, and could only be found in children with comparable backgrounds."
We can only assume that any correlation in beliefs and scoring is the product of an environment which tends to produce both or inhibits the production of both. IE Fox News makes you dumb, and Fox News makes you conservative, concurrently. The study does not mention TV.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yeah, well, I've never felt smarter than when conversing with a conservative.
I will count of the list of Conservative scientists:
End of list
yea let's fight white supremacy with white supremacy, that always works
I'm going to ignore all the issues with this study, and just be happy there are people out there finding the data that shows conservatism is stupidity.
load more comments
(4 replies)
click-bait
Um ackshually It's 'rage bait', specifically for conservatives.
Click bait entices anyone to click through omitted information. Rage bait seeks a click through an emotional reaction from a specific demographic.
Clickbait:
"Local Restaurant Owner Tried One Menu Change and Sales Doubled Overnight"
"A Mom Working 3 Jobs Lost 60 lbs By Cutting This One Ingredient From Her Diet"
Ragebait:
"Study Finds Conservativel Men Have Smaller Penises Than Liberal Men."
"New Data Shows Remote Workers May Be Less Valuable Than In-Office Staff"
Not all ragebait is clickbait. Ragebait is targeted. Know your enemy.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Caring about IQ is stupid even when it validates your preconceptions.
load more comments
(3 replies)
So what determines it in women?
Religion and safety. They have to be surrounded by it and buying in is the only way the think they will stay on this side of the dirt.
load more comments
(1 replies)
yes and/or duh
I am pretty sure that I would flunk IQ tests, and I have leftist preferences. Mathematics and other subjects of high learning are not something I really understand. While I appreciate neat things like electricity, chemistry, design, and AI, I simply don't understand them to any meaningful extent.
That sucks. I would like to have a character sheet with +10 bonuses across the board, and a platinum piece to start my game with. Same goes for the rest of the neighborhood.
There's no flunking an IQ test, but you are probably a normal median person.
load more comments
(1 replies)