this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
161 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7069 readers
1843 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 40 points 3 weeks ago

I hate when it says these things "go rogue"

They're stochastic word generators, if your harness doesn't have anything to prevent bad stuff there's always gonna be a chance it'll delete your database.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is how so-called AI can also create jobs...

This sort of story isn't the norm. But it is a risk. Why would anybody in their right mind chose to implement these half-cooked tools in a production environment? You don't run a beta test during open heart surgery either.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There could be an entire industry just for mitigating and fixing AI related problems.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's the new protection racket! Lovely database you have there. Would be a pity of my model deleted it.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The AI agent’s misdemeanors were then hugely amplified by a cloud infrastructure provider’s API wiping all backups after the main database was zapped.

In what scenario should wiping backups over an API even be a thing?

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For example if you delete an aws database, the associated snapshots are also deleted automatically. It's written in the document and you have to tune some parameters to avoid that.

So I assume the AI deleted the database and they tried to restore it... discovering the database associated snapshots weren't there anymore. oops...

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Snapshots are not a real backup untill you commit them to some sort of immutable storage.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, it's good thing they aren’t putting it into autonomous weapons…

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DoGeeseSeeGod@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

Blood for the blood god!

Skulls for the skull throne!

Random destruction for the gods of chaos!

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Someone wasn't following the 3-2-1 rule. That wouldn't have happened if they used LTO tape backups.

I used to work for a hosting company that had the IBM i servers of insurance companies and big retailers. Servers were replicated in real time but they also had offline backups on LTO tapes.

If you give AI access to your backups, you deserve what happens.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Pholous@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Aaaahahahaha!