Which is WHY I SUPPORT it!
-Proton CEO who Endorses the Politicians MAKING this a Reality!
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
1061 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
85357 readers
4087 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
https://proton.me/blog/anonymity-vs-privacy
These guys are such clowns. They stop just short of saying anonymity is bad by saying things like you can't use your logging if you anonymously log in (duh) and bizarrely you may be more secure without it.
"A good example of this is Proton Mail‘s optional authentication logs feature. Enabling this prevents you from logging into your account anonymously, but it improves your security by allowing you to detect suspicious logins (for example, a login from another country).
For most people, privacy is a great deal more important than anonymity'
They won't provide it with their own service and instead push it onto the user. For instance, most recently they have been known to log credit card data. A company really concerned with security would not store this data on their own servers and there are practical ways to accomplish this.
This company makes its money on security theatre. I swear they are a honeypot for criminals actors and they know it hence why they downplay anonymity.
Is there anything stopping me from uploading an ID for Shrek or something? I foresee an explosion of popularity of fake IDs.
It's been fun lads. Let's make agreements for where we will touch grass together when this happens. Follow-up events will be decided on location
load more comments
(1 replies)
Shocking news! The sky is blue
I'd argue that most things that are currently in the crosshairs for exclusion under age verification are also harmful to at least a third of the adult population and to society in general.
Actually maybe that's just for profit algorithm based social media and / or mass scale surveillance and personal information gathering and advertising.
The point being, if you're going to make a case for something being harmful to kids, you need to also make a case for it's being OK for adults or maybe it just needs banning outright for the good of society, see also smoking. Personally I'm in favor of leaving this in the hands of the individual and parents, and perhaps making easy tools for less technically adept parents to use.
TLDR: If Facebook is bad for kids, why isn't it bad for adults?