this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
180 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29576 readers
2058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/45483

The coalition behind a plan to tax California billionaires on Monday announced it's reached a major milestone in its efforts to get its proposed wealth tax on ballots this fall.

The California Billionaire Tax coalition revealed it has now filed more than 1.5 million signatures, or nearly twice the 875,000 signatures required to make the California Billionaire Tax Act an official state ballot initiative.

The proposed tax, which has drawn opposition from Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom and support from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), will hit the state's billionaires with a one-time 5% wealth tax that proponents say will be used to fund local hospitals, food aid, and public education.

Mayra Castañeda, an ultrasound technologist and a member of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW), which proposed the ballot initiative, said that the tax was essential to preserve quality of healthcare in California.

"When funding is cut, it brings a world of pain," said Castañeda**.** "It means longer ER waits, fewer healthcare workers, rural hospitals shutting down, delayed care, and lives lost that could have been saved. It's clear that most Californians and most billionaires recognize how reasonable and necessary this proposal is—both to keep emergency rooms open and to save California businesses from closing."

Jared Hamil, a member of Teamsters Local 396, said gathering more than 1.5 million signatures in favor of the tax means "we are one step closer to the California we deserve."

"We deserve to be able to afford to see a doctor when we’re sick," Hamil emphasized. "We deserve to know our local hospital will be open and ready to treat you in an emergency. In a nation as rich as ours, that’s the least we deserve."

A poll of California voters conducted last month by the University of California, Berkeley found that the proposed billionaire tax is broadly popular, with support outweighing opposition by a roughly two-to-one ratio.

An analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy estimates that the tax will raise $100 billion in revenue over the next five years, which would be enough to fill the hole in California's state budget caused by the Republican-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act that takes an ax to spending on Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Newsome will veto it. If he can.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 hours ago

FOR A SINGLE GODDAMN TIME

TAX THEM EVERY DAY!

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 hours ago

I've said it before, but this tax is going to be like pulling teeth if it happens. The billionaires will fight it in court for years without ever paying a cent. A one time tax based on a date from a year prior is stupid. There just needs to be a permanent tax every year instead of a one time tax that no one will pay.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The proposed tax, which has drawn opposition from Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Yeah, he fucking sucks.

I gotta wonder how many current gubernatorial candidates support this thing. Presumably not Steve Hilton or Chad Bianco. Billionaire Self-Proclaimed Democrat Tom Steyer does not seem to be a fan, although he's playing the mealy-mouthed "I don't support it because it doesn't go far enough" gambit. Idk about the rest. It's California, so apparently everyone and their pet dog is currently running.

[–] surfrock66@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

His policy on this sucks, but if he's the nominee, the effort is better spent trying to move his positions than poisoning him so we dive straight into a losing strategy in a 2-party system. I hate the game, but that doesn't mean backing a third party and convincing apathetic voters to stay home if he is the nominee would benefit vulnerable people. Rallying against Harris because she wasn't strong enough on Gaza explicitly harmed the people of Gaza. We need to learn from the lesson soaked in their blood.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 6 hours ago

You remind me of the guy who was trying to argue with Charlie Kirk a few months back.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Don't you dare say Newsom fucking sucks. Gavin Newsom will be the next presidential nominee for the DNC, so you better get in line and support him because hey he's not Trump!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh no. I'm so sorry. I'm the reason Trump Won Again, aren't I?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 hours ago

Progressives are done holding their nose to vote

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 9 points 8 hours ago

This would be a SAD day if it passes! There's SO many More Single Mothers on WELFARE that we can Tax INSTEAD of Billionaires!

-Fiscally Responsible Politicians!

[–] Crystalbound@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of the Silicon Valley scene where Russ Hanneman is now justtttt under $1b and thinks the sky is falling

"I had to sell my Bugatti!"

"Isn't there a Maserati in the driveway...?"

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 5 points 8 hours ago

But the doors go like this instead of like this !

[–] null@lemmy.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Get rid of Prop 13. It's feudalism, but without all the cool shitnlike dragons.

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

This is an odd, feel good measure that they’ll just fight off if passed. Why are we wasting time on this when the actual solution is taxing them at the Federal level first, then by willing states.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

This is pretty dumb tax. Might as well give them a free trip to move to Texas or Nevada. It's needs to be Federal with a significant penalty for trying to move money offshore -that will never happen.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (1 children)

They're ~~more~~ not mutually exclusive. People can advocate for both at the same time, and the politicians who would work in favor of one have no jurisdiction to work in favor of the other. And there's no reason to expect there wouldn't be exactly the same legal challenges made by the same people if it were done first nationally.

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Congressional law is a bit more final than a voter initiative.