I know this is just a meme but has Ubuntu fallen that bad?
Ubuntu did welcomed me to the Linux fam 16 years ago or so, so I am grateful but I have not used it for at least 12 years by now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
I know this is just a meme but has Ubuntu fallen that bad?
Ubuntu did welcomed me to the Linux fam 16 years ago or so, so I am grateful but I have not used it for at least 12 years by now
I use Arch with KDE and a bunch of always open applications. At rest it uses 8GB. I paid for the whole 64GB kit, and I'm going to use the whole 64GB.
Iβve got NixOS with KDE and I run several containerized services through podman. System idles at 5.8gb.
I was going to stack 4 to 6 Arch VMs inside each other.
Now I'm wondering if I can go further...
The typical path: Mint -> Arch -> Fedora.
Why go past Arch? What's the use case/flavor?
As someone who uses arch, its just stability. Arch is great for a hobby, if you want to do work, use fedora. Its so much simpler. That being said, I love arch because of the tinkering, and that lack of tinkering is why I switched off fedora.
Ah, got it. Thanks. :)
People losing their voice from telling everyone they use Arch?
Fresh breath -> curved spine -> m'lady
Yeah that's me, but I started on Ubuntu. Arch is awesome, but Fedora does most of the same things and it's so much easier to maintain an installation of
3 years later and I'm still on Mint.
Same. No reason to switch as I have no desire to tinker
Tiny core Linux: i can run on 64 MB of ram.
Arch is love. Arch is life.
I installed 26.04 the other day and it seems like a pretty decent release, I may keep it around for a bit.
Arch, btw
Critique *
I think you can use both: https://comparewords.com/critic/critique
The word critic is a noun, the word critique is the verb.
You would have critiques of Debian, not critic.
ok
Damn you edited the original comment and now my reply is out of context. RIP
Gotteeem!
You literally just used "critique" as a noun.
A critic critiques and can have a critique. A critic can't critics nor can have a critic. A critic can criticize and can have a criticism.
Ergo the statement "critique is a verb" isn't the whole truth.
Critical thinking suggests that it is critical that everyone understands this.