this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
674 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

84281 readers
3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

wow, rare win for Chinese workers.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I think in terms of workers rights, China is rapidly coming up to the West in the 50s. There's a massive growth in middle class as well as white collar jobs, especially in tech and engineering.

This has put pressure on society as a whole for much higher standards of living, and thus better wages and better rights. They are no longer the cheap ass labor country, that's being exported to Africa and such.

Although the 996 culture is still insane, but I think that partly comes from the extreme competitive environment in the tech sector. There were similar stories years ago in the video game industry, and that probably hasn't changed much.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This assumes that people can generally be replaced by AI, which is not true.

AI is an excuse to fire people, and a powerful marketing tool to make a company look better to investors, but it has not had the massive impact techbros want us to believe it has.

Shame, because like everything, it could genuinely be helpful, and instead, we’ve mostly got a bunch of applications no one asked for, and a constant bombardment of dreadful predictions that make regular people go mad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Based China

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] someone@lemmy.today 32 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

There are so many speech restrictions and humans rights violations in China that scare the hell out of me, but then I see rulings like this and their progress on robotics and tech and I think "Well, they are doing something right..." I hope one day there is more free speech for people in China who deserve to be able to say what they want.

It's a great ruling because companies that would normally favor efficiency and profit increases are in a better position to take these existing workers and utilize them in different ways than just have everyone fired en masse and then somehow the market will sort it out. Even under classical economic theories, governments are supposed to regulate externalities and AI displacing workers too rapidly could be considered a type of externality.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

There are so many speech restrictions and humans rights violations in China that scare the hell out of me

I hear an earful about how horrible and repressive the Chinese state government is to its citizens from the outside, largely by national media talking heads and Big Data surveillance company flaks. Meanwhile, the consequences of talking shit on the Chinese internet - account suspension/deactivation, getting in trouble with your employer/school possibly with the threat of firing/expulsion, periodic investigation by state police for threats of violence, possible restrictions on business/travel because you've been added to a "watch list", potential for arrest on some bullshit charge - seem to be all the same kinds of consequences periodically doled out to western citizens.

I'm told Americans have "free speech". But then the Supreme Court lays so many caveats down that even a silly toothless joke is strictly prohibited under US laws. I'm told Chinese officials are brutal and draconian and mean-spirited, but they don't have anything approaching our prison population. I haven't seen evidence of any kind of mob-rule social media gang dedicated to doxing Chinese dissidents, either. So they manage to stay ahead of Canary Mission and Project Veritas in that regard.

I hope one day there is more free speech for people in China who deserve to be able to say what they want.

I want to know what that's supposed to look like in practice. Where can I find the Free Speech that the Evil Foreign Country is supposed to one day get?

Because if the dream is an American style system of free expression... What are we pinning for, really? Chinese Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson? Uyghurs given the Palestine Action treatment? An independent Taiwan that enjoys all the diplomatic kindness we afford to our neighbors down in Haiti and Cuba?

What are we even asking for?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

This is exactly right. 'Free speech' in the US is about to be all but eliminated in a couple of short years. They are starting with the BS age confirmation every State is slowly adding right after California to operating systems. Just watch how fast that turns into China.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think if you look towards northern Europe instead of the US you'll find better references and goals.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

if you look towards northern Europe instead of the US

The UK has some of the most repressive speech laws on Earth. Germany isn't far behind. Given the groundswell of fascist tendency across the Scandinavian bloc, I would not bank on them serving as a model much longer. An uptick in Muslim immigration has kicked off a tidal wave of Islamophobia, which now dominates their domestic politics.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Now that you mention it I definitely want Chinese tucker Carlson and Alex jones

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

I definitely want Chinese tucker Carlson and Alex jones

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s crazy that a country with no free speech has tens of thousands of protests every year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_and_dissent_in_China

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (14 children)

I saw that protests are free as long as they are against the local government. People can complain online and in-person against local authorities and demand central government step in to save them, too. But if the rethoric starts going to "central government is wrong", then it gets supressed

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a source that says that happens in today’s China? I know that Falun Gong is suppressed, but they are literally a CIA-funded group created to undermine the state.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Falun Gong have allied with foreign intelligence services, but they weren't created by those services. Originally, the organization was allied with the Communist Party and on generally good terms. They only ran afoul of the Chinese Communists when Falun Gong leaders became embroiled in increasingly noxious financial and abuse scandals. Not unlike how the Catholic Church's status soured across Europe and the US East Coast following the slew of child sex abuse allegations.

That's when Falun Gong officials started fleeing to the NATO block and issuing increasingly hysterical allegations about the conduct of the CCP towards its members.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the correction. The point remains that today's CCP mostly limits itself to suppressing foreign actors. And why should it need to suppress its own citizens, anyways? The CCP has a 95.5% approval rate. The Chinese people are utterly committed to their socialist project, and rightly view it as a creation to be proud of.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And why should it need to suppress its own citizens, anyways?

The goal of the modern CCP is largely understood to be economic growth and steadily improving quality of life for domestic citizenry as a means of discouraging domestic upheavels (Tianamen and the Falun Gong lead movements being two classic examples).

That's going to come with some level of suppression due to friction between what any subset of the population believes/wants and what the central government believes/wants.

But this isn't - at it's root - a Socialist policy. It is a Confucian policy, with Socialist Characteristics.

The CCP has a 95.5% approval rate.

I hope you're joking.

There's no shortage of dissatisfaction with the CCP from within the Chinese polity. There's no shortage from within the CCP.

But what westerners don't like to talk about is the Mass Line approach employed by Chinese political leadership, which legitimately seeks to minimize conflict in pursuit of maximum economic benefits.

You don't have gonzo gunmen storming Beijing in hopes of winging President Xi, right now, because you don't have a public openly at odds with the mission of the chief executive.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

In 2016, the last year the survey was conducted, 95.5 percent of respondents were either “relatively satisfied” or “highly satisfied” with Beijing.

...

Compared to the relatively high satisfaction rates with Beijing, respondents held considerably less favorable views toward local government. At the township level, the lowest level of government surveyed, only 11.3 percent of respondents reported that they were “very satisfied.”

So, I am not going to dive into the raw numbers, but I'm already a little turned around at

  • relatively satisfied

  • highly satisfied

  • very satisfied

I'll simply note that local governments are also run by Communist Party officials. So claiming the CCP has 99.5% approval (even considering how this is a decade out of date and how "relatively" and "highly" satisfied suggest a bit of a gulf in opinion) is a serious fudge of the real public view.

That said, yeah. Much higher domestic view of the state than in the US/EU block. Definitely a problem for all those NAFO-heads who pine for Regime Change in Beijing.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 hours ago

It's almost as if the speech restrictions and human rights violations are grossly exaggerated or entirely misreported by companies that are exclusively funded by the US intelligence community. . .

Don't get me wrong, some still do exist (especially on the company side of things). Since, you know, it's a country consisting of 1/7th of humanity; but equally it's pretty silly to think 1/7th of humanity is too stupid to do anything about a single supposedly hyper repressive government that allegedly doesn't let them speak against it.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You mean like how the West mashes people skulls in for holding a banner against genocide?

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I bet in China you can talk about the genocide in Gaza without getting beaten, jailed, or deported.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world -3 points 4 hours ago

If CCP and PLA run China experiences high unemployment, the country will implode. The court ruling is one thing, but what will really occur will be the complete opposite. Free West Taiwan!

load more comments
view more: next ›