Monetizing lies about the deaths of children and attacking grieving parents is among the most disgusting right-wing grifts I've seen, and that's some really steep competition.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
97 points (94.5% liked)
politics
29654 readers
1966 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just. Lock. Him. Up.
Seriously. How are civil judgements so laughably toothless that Jones was able to keep broadcasting on Infowars for years after the ruling, keep selling his snake oil, not pay a cent of the judgement against him, and now have multiple new channels across platforms? This is not someone who should be a free man, let alone allowed to keep his bullshit media empire.
He was able to continue broadcasting because his entire net worth is tied up in Infowars, so the only way for the families to get the money they're owed is to extract it from Infowars. Basically, he's more or less obligated to keep the business running so that the new owners (the Sandy Hook families) can squeeze some kind of value out of it.
This comes down to the fact that what they won was a monetary judgment, rather than some kind of injunction against Jones having a platform. I'm sure the families would have been happy with either, but the latter is much harder (if not impossible) to pull off because it runs afoul of the first amendment. But just piledrivering someone's business with debt is fine.
And yes, it's gone on for as long as it has because Jones has been able to consistently tie things up in court. That's one of those double edged swords. It sounds bad when Jones is the defendant, but imagine if we were talking about a queer podcast being sued by JK Rowling. Then we'd want all the legal protections in the world. The knife cuts both ways.
Obviously, in a sane world the families wouldn't have to sue to get him off the air because there would be things like hate speech laws to stop him doing this shit in the first place, but America isn't a big fan of those.
The issue is that's not NECESSARILY true. Jones is a co-owner in multiple companies that sell that snake oil.
Because the alternative is a return to debtors prisons and fuck that with a rusty pole.
In the Onions plea to not stall the turnover they cited how Jones continued to pedel the very same narrative that was ruled criminal from the platform the court refused to hand over in proper time. If any kind of domestic terrorism comes from this the fault lies squarely on the US Criminal Punishment system.
Ethical corruption aside, learning from mistakes is not something AJ does.
Advocating for violence.
Stay classy you piece of shit.
Alex Jones advocates for violence three times before breakfast. Like, I'm not saying it's OK, but calling this "startling" is ridiculous. He literally does shit like this every single day.
I didn't read this one, but the MS NOW article someone posted said he spent part of his final show selling knives with "Liberty or Death" engraved on them.
Hmm, I wonder what those might end up being used for.
they'll probably end up sitting in the kitchen of a bunch of divorce-able old men. The only flesh those knives will be cutting into will be steak burnt on a gas stove.
I'm surprised he wore a shirt for the final broadcast. What a fucking clown.
was there some likelihood that he wouldn't?
This was maybe 1 week ago? Dude is constantly turning his podcast into onlyflabs for no apparent reason.
Onlyflabs is both vile and great. Fuck you.
😧
@homes@piefed.world yes. He has done many a Hulk Hogan impressions over the year
@ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl
Yikes
He should probably shut the fuck up, get a real job, and start paying the money he owes.
Seriously, lashing out ~~defiantly~~ like a petulant toddler is all he's been doing for decades. There's nothing "startling" here, his reaction was as predictable as the sun going down tonight.
Okay buddy, I'm sure the real war starts rn. Can't wait for this dude to overdose on his own supplements.
If he could have a stroke and heart attack at the same time on air so I could watch it over and over again that would be awesome
OK, citizens, you've heard the declaration.
That windbag is all talk. The Onion should just publish a story saying 'bring it, bitch'.
"Asshole grifter says more bullshit." How is this startling?