this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
153 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

84281 readers
3973 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eierkuchen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Absolutely fucked up and they have no clue.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago

Bahahahahaha.... Man. They still don't get it.

[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Just like the "verified" badge on Twitter eh?

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 44 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Pfff, too late spotify. I've already switched to one of your competitors. Allowing AI "artists" at all is unacceptable. No sale.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

How was the switching process?

I've a family account that's fully utilised so if I move I have to drag everyone with me.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, nice try. I still block Spotify on all my devices.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Which competitor doesn't allow them?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 23 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Bandcamp

https://blog.bandcamp.com/2026/01/13/keeping-bandcamp-human/

And unlike streaming sites, you own what you buy, and the artist gets paid much better; you'd have to stream the same song 200+ times with a premium Spotify account to generate the same profit for the artist as just buying the song outright on Bandcamp.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but Bandcamp isn't an alternative to Spotify.

It's an alternative to streaming.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 11 hours ago

Sounds like it's still an alternative!

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I'm using Qobuz. Seems alright so far, unless someone knows something I don't (totally possible lol)

Qobuz is probably the one streaming service I would pay for if they sorted out the huge gaps in their available library.

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I've been using Qobuz for a few months and it's pretty good. They had a rough bug a couple of weeks ago where some songs would stop playing and skip to the next one, but it seems to be resolved.

If you go into settings, you can hook it to last.fm and get lots of cool listening stats.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Qobuz still had a lot of music slop 2 months ago. They promised to clean that up but I'm not sure if they really did it.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I get this when trying to setup an account on that site?

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

not exactly a competitor since it’s a music marketplace, not a streaming service, but bandcamp does not allow ai-generated music

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 49 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They should have used a 💩 for the AI artists instead.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 35 points 14 hours ago

They should just not allow AI "artists" at all.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

They've been using it as an infinite money glitch for awhile now. Make AI slop music and make a bunch of bots listen to it for the ad revenue. Nobody makes the music, nobody listens to the music, nobody listens to the ads, but Spotify gets paid. They'll never crack down on this unless they themselves have to stop. Until than, they'll just "assume" everything is made by people and play dumb when questioned.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

For the people asking “but who will buy ther products/services after they replace us with AI?’, this is the answer. It hasn’t mattered for a while now

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Which is what I find crazy. That money comes from advertising which is not endless. How are the advertisers able to show any semblance of ROI when nothing is passing through? Obviously Spotify doesn't care if the proles voice their discontent. But how are they able to keep the advertisers from getting fed up with no returns?

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think in business attribution is really difficult. Like figuring out why a click/purchase happened. It might be that these systems are so opaque and difficult to penetrate that nobody notices when hundreds of millions are missing. Or maybe the actual situation is a little different, like maybe real people do listen to AI music. I've heard a bit about that anyway. Though I've also heard about organized criminals combining affiliated artists and bot listens to launder money.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 0 points 12 hours ago

This can't possibly be profitable for the scammers.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 8 points 11 hours ago

Fuck Spotify. I'll buy albums (drm free, mostly from Bandcamp), pirate, or go without.

Today is bandcamp Friday, too. Bandcamp passes their cut on to the band.

[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I only care about this if they also have the functionality to block them from being recommended in any algorithms, or better yet prevent anyone from listening to it at all

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

or better yet prevent anyone from listening to it at all

So you're advocating for top down control when it comes to consumption of online media rather than letting people choose for themselves?

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 1 points 2 hours ago

top down control

That ship has sailed the moment the user made a Spotify account

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And how long until they start accepting money from people to Verify their AI created garbage?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

I assumed that was already the case here.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well okay then..and fuck Spotify anyway.

The pirate life is the only way to be. Take to the seas mateys!!

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️ Yarr!! 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 4 points 13 hours ago

How are they "verifying" that it's a flesh and blood human, and that the human doesn't rely on AI? No digital method would work. You'd need to visit in person and have at least one other human witness them singing or playing without internet access.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 13 hours ago

See, that's how you make actual users buy the badges. Now to be considered not AI you have to put money up. Who wins? Spotify does. And they don't even have to make verification all that thorough, just enough to say they tried to filter out the worst of the bots.