this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
123 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

6809 readers
1013 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 8 minutes ago

They want to make future generations unable to think for themselves, and to be dependent on their tech their whole lives

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

How about including an AI disinformation in this literacy class? Or using AI as a search engine to do fact checking. But I think they really mean "use AI for everything in schools and feed the data back to us" classes.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

You mean not using AI for fact checking?!?

Like, teaching them how to fact check everything AI says, because it's rubbish?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

they already have data how AI hurts students ability to read and write proficiently.

[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 5 points 9 hours ago
[–] outandinburger@ttrpg.network 57 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, they fund AI literacy, but…. Actual literacy is a problem

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

AI literacy as in using AI to answer all your questions, aka brainrot.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

They don't want literate people. The majority of American adults read below a sixth grade level, and about a quarter are functionally illiterate - source

(Though my personal favorite statistic from that page is that 2/3 of illiterate Americans were born in the US, who often the same people who complain endlessly about immigrants speaking multiple languages)

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 5 minutes ago

Is that stat just English literacy?

If someone can read Spanish but not English, are they deemed illiterate?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 6 minutes ago

How do I test my own reading level?

[–] pipi1234@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

This is akin to promoting the use of a product as mandatory in the school system. Oh yes, line cow milk.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago

And by “literacy” they mean “promoting the use of”.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 10 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Yet gun education is still not a thing

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm usually opposed to teaching abstinence, but I'd much rather teach abstinence to gun use than teach kids how to load and store a firearm safely.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Regular education is barely a thing.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 16 points 20 hours ago

"literacy" -> marketing

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 30 points 23 hours ago

So the mega corps that need AI to be integrated into every facet of our society are now going to force feed AI down your children's throats. Isn't this country the best?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 23 hours ago

With all this discourse about AI one thing just keeps being the best indicator for something being wrong: If it were so great and pefect, it wouldnt need to be forced into everything. People would just integrate it themselves.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 22 hours ago

AI literacy

Meaning know less, understand less, depend on our product so you will become a good mindless drone that we can control?

Seriously, what the fuck is there to know about AI for the average joe? Nothing, that is the entire point.

This literally is about creating dependency and I would not allow my kids to have to follow such a shit education

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Read the article. And the definition in the bill is "teach how to use the technology." In the same way you are taught how to use a computer.

Down side it makes the software more accepted. But at the same time the best practices (actually learning the techinal not just "write these types of prompts.") Would result in disillusion of the BS hype as your seeing the Actual Indian behind the curtain

[–] illi@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

the best practices (actually learning the techinal not just "write these types of prompts.")

With Google and Microslop pushing for this, I imagine the important parts beyond "this is how you prompt" will somehow get left out.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 2 points 13 hours ago

Oddly enough it wouldn't. After all someone has to keep the LLM models maintained and we are not at a stage of AI self maintain itself

(Still distopia, speaking as a programming major, LLM maintance wasn't why I took that degree track.)

[–] LLMhater1312@piefed.social 6 points 21 hours ago

Cool create the problem, make the public pay for it

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The education needs to happen, but not for the reasons they are doing it - kids need to know how ai works so they know why it doesn't in many cases. Disspelling the magic answer machine idea from everyone's minds starts with learning how it works and how it doesn't.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Thats the one thing that is a necessary out of all of this. Its already out there, so learning the fundamentals and its limitations is the best case. It should be highly applicable to the concepts of LLMs which are broader and can be used for good purposes.

Of course, the techy kids and even teenagers may dabble in AI in their free time, with a bit more thought put in. Even if gen alpha isnt the most fond with AI.

[–] someone@sopuli.xyz 3 points 22 hours ago

The movies didn't lie, it was a real shit.