this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
131 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6929 readers
2081 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“What educators, parents and policy officials really needed was high quality data and evidence to help guide them. What they have had to deal with instead is some substandard research.”

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260504182905/https://www.404media.co/nature-retracts-paper-on-the-benefits-of-chatgpt-in-education/

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bonenode@piefed.social 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well sorry, but fuck you Nature Journal. Damage is done, people will quote this paper as they please leaving conveniently out its retracted.

What am I saying, the whole system of retractions is so crap that most people won't even notice anyhow.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

The Lancet took 12 years to retract the Wakefield paper. Those cunts have done more harm than any disease.

Shut them all down. Private publishing on the model set forth by Ghislaine Maxwell's father has been a complete fail. There needs to be one central, open resource with transparent peer review.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With this and the multiple recent accounts of publications with clearly[poorly] AI written text/images, Nature is losing its status

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Nature has more manuscripts flagged on Pubpeer than any journal.