this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
130 points (98.5% liked)

politics

29654 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump exacted revenge on Indiana Republican legislators who foiled his redistricting push last year in the state, backing challengers who unseated five incumbents in Tuesday's primaries, NBC News projects.

One other GOP state senator who faced a Trump-endorsed opponent was locked in a tight race, while another survived.

The double-digit defeats of the five incumbents, some of whom are veterans of the Indiana Legislature, underscore the influence Trump continues to wield over the Republican Party, even as his approval rating among Americans broadly sags amid rising gas prices and the Iran war.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 80 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You'd think the pro-pedo, pro-rapist, pro-felon, pro-war, pro-inflation, pro-dementia, pro-high gas prices endorsement would be a curse. Maybe not in a MAGA primary.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 45 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

News loves to talk about Trump's 33% approval rating, but that is 66% of the GOP. Add on some people leaving the GOP over the pedo-issue, the war-issue, or the grift-issue, and Trump should do well in primaries. Terrible in the general, but good in primary.

Just gotta watch out for 2020 republicans running as 2026 democrats.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Your assuming 50% on the country is GOP. It's closer to 35% not counting children.

That 33% approval is more like 95% of the GOP.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I saw something just now about it, one of these races was 4k to 5k...

Very few people vote in Republican primaries. And going from incumbents to maga extremists could very likely cost them seats in the general.

It'll depress republican turnout some what, but this is one of the few scenarios "anyone but trump" pays off.

People that would never vote but are just really pissed at Trump and their typical red state governments might actually turnout now. Just to spite trump.

trump gains almost nothing, because redistristicing was a dumb idea. The people who saved him from a significant negative consequence, were just fired because he can't see that there was a possible negative consequence coming.

This is how most fascist governments fall, they insulate the leaders from reality and eventually the lie can't hold up.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'm really hoping we can flip Indiana District 9. The last time a non-Republican won the seat was in 2008. But the incumbent is Erin Houchin who is straight up Trump's ass which hopefully hurts her this year. And Brad Meyer, who was my pick of the Democrats running, won the primary and seems to be a very good and smart guy with sensible policies. It's the best chance we've had in years.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I'm human, I swear.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Good luck. Madison had some good folks running Chataqua back when I lived there.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The purge of establishment Republicans who are just as evil but know how to work the system continues...

They'll get replaced by empty suits just there for the grift, or useful idiots. Either way, they're more likely to turn on trump when his back is finally against the wall. And more likely to lose general elections than the incumbents.

Fucking with these primaries all over the country will add up. Not just in federal goverment, but pulling a lot of "safe" red states back into competition. And trump needs red state governments if he's going to try and rig/cancel the presidential election.

MAGA that's becoming disillusioned would have still turned out in a general for who they stupidly believe has been helping, but if they're turned off trump, they may not turn out to vote for his picks that just kicked "their guys" out of office when they were happy (again, due to stupidity) with who they had

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I saw an interesting observation during returns last night that there was a trend of more rural districts keeping incumbents while those closer to cities flipped to Trunp-endorsed candidates. I'd love it if these redhats get whomped by Dems in the fall,

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Kind of still a loss if this moves Republicans more towards gerrymandering and such, plus I'm not sure what's going to happen in Indiana if all places-- it's literally one of the most backwards ass places.

Still nice to think about the state finally having a balanced state legislation though if it did happen, though. It gets way too overlooked in general elections, elections which are themselves generally overlooked.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Proving Muricans remain unable to learn...

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Trump, via his tech bros, has an internet browsing history on all of those motherfuckers who are scared to be found out, even though there is nothing morally wrong about choking the chicken from time to time, provided that your "arousal material" is legal. But here we are...