Well their work sure as fuck isn’t based on objectivity.
this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
461 points (99.6% liked)
politics
30531 readers
2712 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
walks line a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck... claims it's a zebra.
I’m upset that I view Roberts as a dude who doesn’t have my balls on his chin.
You want that?
I promise you that he won't enjoy it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The costumed fossils are complete detached from reality. Civil religion at its worst. Fucking gross.
Oh, go fuck yourself, Roberts, you right-wing cuck!
They're not political actors.
They're political sheep.
ROFL!
I am just calling it the SC Voting Rights Interpretation now, the Act Congress approved has been completely hollowed out. If they want to create laws they should have ran for Congress.
No, I don't think they're fucking actors. Obviously I'm upset because the jobs are real, you dumb stupid fuck. But I'd gladly take Martin Sheen over you, sure. Good idea.
What does he think he’s doing by constantly complaining about this?
Justices consider their words carefully before speaking. What could possibly be the reason beyond letting off steam… repetitively and publicly?
Is it to tamp down public criticism of the court? If so, who cares? It won’t work, and they have lifetime appointments.
Is it out of guilt because the assertion is obviously factually untrue?
Maybe some of these guys just watch way too much Fox News and conservative media. They’ve been airing grievances just like these outlets. LOOKING AT YOU ALITO
Well, that's only because the Supreme Court is mostly political actors. Can't see why he's confused.
John Wilks Booth was a political actor.
This Supreme Courrt is political and open to all bidders.
It's not political obviously. He is the ultimate harbinger of truth and were just not listening!
He incorrect.
If it walks like a duck, and quakes like a duck, etc.
The court has also in several cases weakened the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, including in a ruling last week that led to outrage and disappointment on the left.
Yep. Figures. Even the fucking Voting Rights Act is a fringe issue now.
I'm so fucking hungry.
Rob, you're a pedophile actor. Please cease breathing now.
I dunno. Might be because most of them and were certainly chosen to be political actors
... Perhaps stop acting like them then
Lady Justice and the Constitution were your personal plaything, Roberts, but you prostituted them for Trump and now that you've made them completely subservient to his crazy stupid nastiness, you've realised he doesn't need your permission for anything anymore and just expects your compliance. You're his toy now and you want the American people, who you fucked over for decades, to supply the respect for the constitution and the law that you squandered so fully?
The word is 'rightly'
Did it occur him that he could avoid this perception by not making so many political decisions?
John Roberts, people are gonna piss on your grave, John Roberts. You're a stain.