this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
980 points (97.3% liked)

politics

29715 readers
2633 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"What’s funny about that is they assume my ambition is positional. They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever."

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Man, AOC vs Trump 2024 would have been soooo epic.

Even if she lost, still better to put a good foot forward than what they ended up doing

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Something like 75% of American voters want universal health care, 90% of Democrat voters want it, and over 50% of Independents.

(these are approximations there are many polls pick your favorite)

Unfortunately, in the USA it's "donations" that control legislation, cash is king. Our reps have two choices... do what Americans want (healthcare, higher wages and benefits, less bombs), or do what makes them and their entire family filthy rich.

It's hard to resist the allure of money, they won't give it up willingly. Landing leadership positions means millions of dollars a year, cushy political appointments (like your husband/wife landing an abassadorship to Bermuda), and other fantastic benefits, it's blatant.

[–] Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whenever polls regarding universal healthcare are discussed, I always add that that if you want to gauge how popular universal healthcare is in the US, you need to subtract the over age 65 respondents (which leads to it polling even more favorably). Why? Because despite being the age demographic most opposed to universal healthcare, that is the one demographic that already has universal healthcare. And it’s not because they think Medicare is bad - on the contrary, Medicare is very popular among seniors. They love it. They just think they deserve universal healthcare while everyone else just wants to mooch off the system. So frankly I don’t care what they think about universal healthcare, actions speak louder than words.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I 100% get not committing to run right now, it would be stupid to do so.

"In this op-ed that Bezos paid for in The Washington Post, there was a veiled threat — it was the elite saying if you want this job, you just stepped out of line," said Ocasio-Cortez. "What’s funny about that is they assume my ambition is positional. They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever."

But I sure as fuck hope she realizes becoming president is our best shot at that.

Shed drive down ballot races like Obama did, but isn't as cocky and obsessed with personal power to ignore the DNC after winning like Obama did. Shed name a progressive chair.

Bringing in a wave of progressives and putting the party firmly on the progressive side of the divide is absolutely the biggest thing she (or anyone) can do to get us single payer healthcare.

So like I said, hopefully she's planning to run, just smart enough to not say it yet.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 30 points 3 days ago (22 children)

I'm not telling her what to do, she's clearly better at this stuff than I'll ever be

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I already have an AOC 2028 shirt my maga fil got it for me, I'm not quite sure he expected me to like it as much as I do.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 15 points 2 days ago

What a considerate gift.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

She is right it’s not the title important and right now Dems needs someone that would unify the party. Trump won not because he had much more votes than 2020, but because Harris had 6 million votes less than 2020

I am already seeing a lot of Dems saying again they will not vote by X or Y… MAGA is voting doesn’t matter what

So the party will need someone that unifies more the party… but it seems unlikely

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Thanks, Raw Story, for the textbook clickbait. What a shit outlet.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There won't be anymore meaningful elections in the US. Just pageantry.

Everything that we thought made our country different and agencies for "checks and balances" were just an illusion

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›