this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
404 points (97.4% liked)

politics

29715 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Hahahaha wawahahaha

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It simplifies life that any statement beginning with "Trump has a better understanding..." is false. That can be relied on at the same level of certainty as the laws of Thermodynamics.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

The Bible is a weird maniacal rambling mess, so that tracks?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Depending on what is meant by "understanding", it might be true that Trump has a better understanding of the bible than Pope Leo.

If you're talking about a scholarly understanding, then surely Leo has a better understanding. I mean, Trump can barely read in the first place. He definitely hasn't ever read the bible on his own initiative. A small child who goes to Sunday school has a better scholarly understanding of the bible than Trump.

However, Trump at his core is a con man and game recognizes game, as they say. Religion is one of history's greatest cons. The bible was written by the uneducated, by lunatics and the delusional, and by confidence tricksters. So on that level, Trump likely understands that the bible is all bullshit that isn't worth the paper it's written on. And so in that way, it might be true that Trump understands the bible better than Pope Leo.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 day ago

This deluded loser is just as demented as Trump is and Trump barely understands breathing, so as long as it doesn't involve raping children he doesn't understand anything.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

We talking the same guy that couldn't recite his favorite Bible passage?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 days ago

The Cult of the Dead Merkavist has spawned multiple cults of the antichrists.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I'm going to doubt that on the grounds that the dude seems to be functionally illiterate.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

If Jesus the hardline orthodox Jew from first century Galilee came back to life today, or even a century after his death, he would be appalled that gentiles have created an entirely new religion out of the worship of his idol, and he’d have far more in common with those Jews who have adhered strictly to (his interpretation) of the laws in Leviticus, like the Haredim.

Of course there’s some nuance, Jesus was certainly a revolutionary looking to upend the established order, but these modern “Christians” are completely off the map in terms of what Jesus was doing and teaching.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's also funny because there's no way to understand the Bible better or worse.

What a weird world we live in.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›