this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
1515 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84701 readers
3881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't agree with everything he does, but he's right more than he's wrong and I also have no idea how he walks around with balls the size of watermelons. You GO Louis.

[–] R1x38rexrper@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Everyone with a strong sense of justice is a little annoying, they have to be, and we should be grateful for them.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago

Somewhere along the way our neoliberal overlords figured out that they needed to teach people to hate annoyance more than evil, and it's been crazy effective.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

*Dicks fuck Assholes, chuck."

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

There is one thing everyone misses in this pissing contest. Bambu is a Chinese company. So any lawsuit will probably need to take place in China. It ain't happening in the US or the Europe. So, guess who wins.......

Josef Prusa wrote a blog post, recently about this. I have to apologize that I can't seem to find a link to it right now. But the gist of it is.

Bambu forked Prusa Slicer and had to be threatened to publish the code for the fork by Prusa the company, "stealing" ideas and claiming it your own is just good business in China, because the code is all AGPL.

But Bambu has a problem now. The Chinese government requires access to their technology and cloud. Because one way or another, the Chinese government requires access to any industries tech under "National Security". So Bambu can't allow access to 3rd party actors in this case because the government can't control the access of the outside code, which makes it illegal.

So Bambu has screwed themselves by forking an open source project that requires anyone to have access to the code and be able to use that code and make changes to that code. That the Chinese government doesn't allow. And Bambu didn't pay attention and let that little snippet of code that is under contention loose under the AGPL. As I have claimed all along, Bambu does not have the smartest coders on payroll.

But Bambu is pretty sure the Chinese courts have their back in this matter. In the past, Prusa has seriously considered going after Bambu in court. But the Prusa's lawyers know they can't win no matter how righteous the case because, well China. And Prusa most likely has access to much better lawyers than Rossmann does. So this ain't going nowhere.

Josef Prusa is very angry because it's evident the AGPL means nothing if it can't be enforced and Bambu is worried that it will get screwed over in the market because they could lose a lot of sales over this. Or even get their products banned in some countries. Or not. Many Bambu fans seem to care very little about it. Because just use "Developer Mode" without understanding the deeper implications. And that it's not really any protection.

Edit to add: When push comes to shove, just who do you think Bambu is going bend the knee to? Some court 1000s of miles away? Or the Chinese government that's right outside the door? And yes, if you want to sue a Chinese company about patent, you will need to do it in China.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does Rossman have any presence in China? If not, and if the files are hosted outside China, there's nothing China can do.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right. By their argument it seems like China can get fucked because what are they gonna do, kidnap him and bring him to China to face charges?

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The Chinese government does not are about Rossmann. They care about control of Bambu.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

These particular files are hosted on GitHub, which is owned by Microsoft, which currently enjoys the ability to do business in China. There are probably things China can do in this case.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

For the Chinese government, it's not as much about where the files are hosted. It's about whether they can control the code in the name of 'national security'. And third party code is outside of Chinese governmental oversight and control. Remember the "Great Wall of China" and the internet? That's the control they seek.

And the Chinese government will punish Bambu if they do not stop it. Which why they will have Bambu's back in a Chinese court. And why Bambu has screwed themselves and are between a rock and a hard place.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You mean get Microsoft to take it down? And then it goes back up on a self-hosted git repo? This does not enable Bambu, Microsoft, or anyone else to sue Rossman in China.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 191 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (30 children)

Great move by Snapmaker. In considering buying a new printer soon I am very annoyed by how difficult it is to know beforehand how much functionality of a printer is locked behind cloud connectivity that can be remotely disabled at any point. I know Bambu is to avoid absolutely thanks to the very public backlash they got but what about the others?

I know Prusa is a shining example of letting their customers own their devices but they are pricy. I didn't know Snapmaker had the same kind of mentality until now thanks to that move.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You might check out the Consumer Rights Wiki, also started by Rossman. It's crowd sourced, and lists anti-consumer BS like forced cloud subscriptions for a lot of companies.

Just find a printer, look up the company there, and see how legit they are. There's even a browser plugin that pops up on any website that has an entry on the wiki.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] NegativeLookAhead@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

I was pretty close to buying a P2S until I saw Jeff Geerlings latest video, which led me to Rossmanns. Bambu labs obviously hates its users, why would I give them my money?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 123 points 2 days ago (38 children)

It looks like Rossman is saying that anyone can post this code because it's an open source, GPL code. Rossman also posted the code: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jhRqgHxEP8&t=2s

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Right, there are many forks of the software, which is allowed under the AGPL licence.

Slic3r by Alessandro Ranellucci established the original open-source foundation.

Then PrusaSlicer forked from that -ok.

Then Orcaslicer forked from that -ok.

Then Bambu locked down it's fork - not ok, violation of the slic3r AGPL.

It's like..can I borrow your car? puts a bumper sticker on it, changes the locks, my car now.

Slic3r is licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License, version 3.

The GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) is a strong copyleft, free software license designed to ensure source code remains open, even when software is run over a network. Based on GPLv3, it closes the "ASP loophole" by requiring companies that modify and offer software as a service (SaaS) to make the source code available to users.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 84 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Jarczak’s fork crossed the line by injecting falsified identity metadata into its network communication. “In simple terms: it pretended to be the official Bambu Studio client when communicating with our servers.”

If it's easy enough to get access to your cloud infrastructure by just changing some metadata about the connection, then you really should re-think your authentication systems. If I were to publish the exact model and pinning of the lock on my house, it would be silly of me to be mad that someone used that to make their own keys.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The DMCA is literally written in a way that they could write “DO NOT USE” in a text file and include it with firmware and claim that using the firmware Ina way they didn’t like was “breaking a digital lock”

Honestly I’m perfectly fine with the DMCA just being entirely revoked at this point. It has enabled more bad than it has done good, even when things went “right”

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hayvan@piefed.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I don't even have a 3d printer and I just git clone'd the entire repo to my media server.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In case someone comes across this and doesn't know, "forking" a repo by just clicking that button on github won't preserve your copy if the upstream repo gets taken down. If you're trying to preserve it, make sure you have a copy independent of github's control. Like a local backup

yeah all of the people in the comments of his video are so happy about their forks 😭 at least their heart is in the right place ❤️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 57 points 2 days ago
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (29 children)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today 51 points 2 days ago (27 children)

I'm happy with my slightly modded Ender 3 Pro, but if I ever upgrade the Snapmaker U1 looks nice. I'll only buy from a company that supports open source firmware. Bambu is trash, unfortunately every 3D printing related YouTuber seems to have happily taken a sponsorship from them so they are everywhere now. I hate it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

The problem with Bambu is they are not trash at all. Their printers are high-quality, and the way they integrate with their proprietary slicer (that they totally stole from the community before locking it down) and MakerWorld is genuinely excellent.

I have 3 Bambu printers. I don't buy their products anymore (my newest printer is an SV-08 max), but I still use the ones I have and they're excellent, easy machines. And if someone new comes to me wanting a starter "just click print and it works" solution, I'm still likely to point them towards an A1 mini. They're cheap and work great out of the box with zero handholding from me required.

And that's why I kinda hate them. They don't have to be dickheads, but choose to be. Their products are fantastic, and I'd honestly be using Bambu Studio for them instead of Orca anyway.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 days ago (8 children)

their proprietary slicer

That's the problem, it cannot be proprietary when based off slic3R. It's not their property to lock down.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›