this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
8 points (59.5% liked)

Technology

86646 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Itโ€™s an aggregator of AI blowhards from Twitter ๐Ÿคฎ

[โ€“] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah, all the X links are the fucking worst. No fucking thanks.

[โ€“] Krusty@quokk.au 7 points 2 months ago

Trash summarizing trash.

[โ€“] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 2 months ago

"Digg watches what 1,000 of the most thoughtful voices in AI are paying attention to, and ranks the stories they're pointing at by what's rising fastest," Rose said.

...

It also uses AI from services such as xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Gemini to "classify public accounts, summarize public posts and linked articles, describe public media, generate topic labels, score public content and power search." That would explain how Digg quantifies user sentiment into a percentage for its posts.

Focus on AI. AI apologists from Xitter. Powered by AI summarizers.

Barf.

[โ€“] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight. They pulled it offline because it was overrun with bots, and legitimate users had no influence.

Their solution was to hand all influence over to a bot.

Genius. /s

[โ€“] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago

If ya can't beat em, join em

[โ€“] db2@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago
[โ€“] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago
[โ€“] WarmSoda@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
[โ€“] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

They also have a new URL. I assume this is because the old one still had SEO juice that bots wanted to slurp up.

https://di.gg/

[โ€“] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Dead on arrival. Such a s tupid concept yo rank contrnt based on tweets

[โ€“] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Like, again again? Wasn't the first reboot already AI infested?

[โ€“] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Wow thats like... the exact opposite of a thing I would want to experience.

I guess good job on creating a business model as rage bait?

[โ€“] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People should actually read digg.com homepage. The articles dont give the full story. So they're just starting out focusing on Ai, but plan to expand what digg aggregates. Guess we'll I just have to see how that goes....

[โ€“] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They should have stuck it out with the Reddit clone. The AI focus is shit.

[โ€“] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Dollar store reddit, now with extra AI crap? Oooooh..... Sounds fucking terrible!