this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
572 points (80.4% liked)

memes

22057 readers
3354 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Those cost money. Installation cost go up and maintenance cost every year goes up because you need that equipment.

If you have any sense you put them where they are cheap to put first. Not where there is any free space.

[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The concept of "our" land is sadly outdated. As Chomsky said : "The fundamental role of the government is to protect property from the majority, and so it remains".

(BTW, I'm not as well read as my quote might imply - I first heard it on a Manic Street Preachers track, but it struck home!)

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Can't talk about other countries but as someone working in the EV charging business in the UK that gets asked why we don't routinely do this for EV charging bays: planning permission. Anything that goes above head height is a right pain in the arse to get permission for.

(I also suspect people that ask that are wildly overestimating the power output of a parking bay's worth of solar vs what an EV takes to charge - if we do put panels up we just sell the energy straight to the grid, it's not worth the added complexity of trying to actually use the power ourselves)

[–] Razak@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Oh damn. First time I see this idea. That's awesome. Great utilization of available space.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

For electricity purposes the field outside of town is close.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

or just cover all the buildings, you already need those roofs

[–] laserjet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Without knowing any technical details, anybody can see by looking that it will be be harder to build and maintain something like is pictured with those fragile individual car covers. A strong wind would take them away.

Why not build a proper roof to put them on?

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And drainage ditches

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Rooftops, bus shelters, parking lots, south-facing building facades…lots of existing places to put panels other than glassing over what could be animal habitat.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›