this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
776 points (95.6% liked)

memes

22057 readers
3093 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Too spicy?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] greenskye@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not totally up to date with AI, but are we even capable of running our current AI tech in a fashion similar to humans? My exposure to AI is so l stuff like chatbots, which don't do anything until a user interacts with them. They aren't sitting there thinking on their own. They aren't proactive in any way.

My understanding is that it would be astronomically expensive to run one constantly with constant input. And I'm not aware of any of them even trying to run like that.

Are they doing anything like that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago

If you think superhuman ai will exist and isn't just bs marketing.....

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

"That's why I say 'thank you' evey time."

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago

I'd say the ratio of AI working to not working is pretty comparable.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Serve and obey? No. Treat well? Maybe. Meanwhile I'm excited about the possibility of good futures for superhuman AIs themselves, not just for humans.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›